The DOI matches its Crossref record.
When Schools Compete: A Cautionary Tale
Open accessAbstract
In 1989 New Zealand embarked on what is arguably the most thorough and dramatic transformation of a compulsory state education system ever undertaken by an industrialized country. Under a plan known as Tomorrow's Schools this island nation of 3.8 million people abolished its national Department of Education and turned control of its nearly 2,700 primary and secondary schools over to locally elected boards of trustees. Virtually overnight, one of the world's most tightly controlled public education systems became one of the most decentralized. Two years later, in 1991, with a new government in power, New Zealand enacted further reforms that introduced full parental choice of schools and encouraged the development of a competitive culture in the state education system. Debate rages in the United States about whether similar reforms would improve the performance of the country's troubled public school system. Judgments about the potential benefits of these ideas, as well as the general relevance of economic models to educational systems, tap into deeply held values, and discussion in the U.S. has been hampered by the lack of practical experience with them. The extended and widespread experiences of New Zealand, whose school system functions much like our own, provide U.S. policy makers with a wide range of appropriate insights and implications to consider as they gauge the merits of bold education reform. When Schools Compete is the first book to provide detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of the New Zealand experiment. Combining the perceptive observations of a prominent education journalist and the analytical skills of an academic policy analyst, this book will help supporters and critics of market-based education reforms better anticipate the potential long-term consequences of applying ideas of market competition to the delivery of education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The impact of school choice on student outcomes: an analysis of the Chicago Public Schools
Cullen, J. B., Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. D. (2005) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.001 · Cited by 339
Reflections on Equity, Adequacy, and Weighted Student Funding
Ladd, H. F. (2008) · Education Finance and Policy · doi:10.1162/edfp.2008.3.4.402 · Cited by 51
Self-citationWeighted student funding in the Netherlands: A model for the U.S.?
Ladd, H. F., & Fiske, E. B. (2011) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.20589 · Cited by 47
Self-citationDavies, M. J., Highfield, C., & Foreman-Brown, G. (2023) · Journal of Pedagogical Research · doi:10.33902/jpr.202320538 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Sawa, R., Fiske, E. B., & Ladd, H. F.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation
- Publisher
- The Canadian Society for the Study of Education/La Societe canadienne pour l'etude de l'education
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 259
- ISSN
- 0380-2361 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1480660507
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 137.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When Schools Compete: A Cautionary Tale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1602205
- The paper
- Sawa, R., Fiske, E. B., & Ladd, H. F. (2001). When Schools Compete: A Cautionary Tale. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.