The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method
Abstract
Foreword by Jonathan Cutler Translator's Preface PrefaceIntroduction 1. Order 2. Duration 3. Frequency 4. Mood 5. VoiceAfterword Bibliography Index
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gatt, A., & Krahmer, E. (2018) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.5477 · Cited by 776
The narrative paradigm: An elaboration
Fisher, W. R. (1985) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637758509376117 · Cited by 549
Complex Thinking, Complex Practice: The Case for a Narrative Approach to Organizational Complexity
Tsoukas, H., & Hatch, M. J. (2001) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726701548001 · Cited by 489
Narrativity, Narrative Identity, and Social Action: Rethinking English Working-Class Formation
Somers, M. R. (1992) · Social Science History · doi:10.1017/s0145553200016679 · Cited by 398
Scripts, Sequences, and Stories: Elements of a Postclassical Narratology
Herman, D. (1997) · PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America · doi:10.2307/463482 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Prince, G., Genette, G., & Lewin, J. E.
- Venue
- Comparative Literature
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1980
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 413
- ISSN
- 0010-4124 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161098141
- Cited by
- 2,019
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 338.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1770890
- The paper
- Prince, G., Genette, G., & Lewin, J. E. (1980). Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Comparative Literature. https://doi.org/10.2307/1770890
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
