Cited by 52Narrative Theory and AnalysisLiterary Theory and Cultural HermeneuticsShort Stories in Global Literature

Teller-Characters and Reflector-Characters in Narrative Theory

Stanzel, Franz K.·1981·Poetics Today

Abstract

The theory of narrative which I have presented in Theorie des Erziihlens' and from which the following is an extract (mainly of chapter six) concentrates on the process of narrative transmission. It is based on the assumption that mediacy (Mittelbarkeit) is the generic characteristic that distinguishes narrative from drama, poetry and, as a rule, also from film. Being a complex generic phenomenon, mediacy has to be analyzed on the basis of its chief constitutive elements. These are presented in the form of the following oppositions of distinctive features: identity and non-identity of the realism of the fictional characters and of the narrator (first-/third-person narration); internal and external perspective (limited point of view/omniscience); teller-character and reflector-character as agents of transmission (telling/showing). The structural significance of these basic oppositions emerges from the observation that a transformation of a narrative text determined by one pole of one of these oppositions into a text dominated by its opposite elements usually alters the meaning of the narrative. In this way the central chapters of the Theorie attempt a verification of the structural significance of these oppositions. Illustrations are drawn mainly from English, American and German novels, ranging from DeFoe, Sterne, and Goethe, to Thomas Mann, Faulkner, Joyce, Beckett, M. Frisch, and Vonnegut. In the teller/reflector opposition we perceive two contrary manifestations of mediacy…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1772187

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stanzel's distinction between teller-characters and reflector-characters can be equated with Genette's narrator and focalizer, respectively.

    “Stanzel (1981) makes a central distinction in modes of narration by dividing narrating characters to teller-characters and reflector-characters. These can be equated with Genette ' s (1988) narrator and focalizer, respectively.”

    From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Stanzel (1981)

  • First-person narrators that do not verbalize their thoughts are not teller-characters if they do not communicate with the reader, but only talk to themselves.

    “First-person narrators that do not verbalize their thoughts are not teller-characters, if they do not communicate with the reader, but only talk to themselves (Stanzel, 1981).”

    From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Stanzel, 1981

  • The distinction between teller-characters and reflector-characters does not necessarily follow the division to first- and third-person narrators.

    “The distinction between teller-characters and reflector-characters does not necessarily follow the division to first- and third-person narrators.”

    From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Stanzel, 1981

Authors
Stanzel, F. K.
Corresponding author
Stanzel, Franz K.
Venue
Poetics Today
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1981
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
5
ISSN
0333-5372 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2319810791
Cited by
52
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Poetics Today (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Short Stories in Global Literature
Keywords
narrative theory, narrative transmission, narrator, first-person narration, third-person narration, omniscience, fictionality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review