Teller-Characters and Reflector-Characters in Narrative Theory
Abstract
The theory of narrative which I have presented in Theorie des Erziihlens' and from which the following is an extract (mainly of chapter six) concentrates on the process of narrative transmission. It is based on the assumption that mediacy (Mittelbarkeit) is the generic characteristic that distinguishes narrative from drama, poetry and, as a rule, also from film. Being a complex generic phenomenon, mediacy has to be analyzed on the basis of its chief constitutive elements. These are presented in the form of the following oppositions of distinctive features: identity and non-identity of the realism of the fictional characters and of the narrator (first-/third-person narration); internal and external perspective (limited point of view/omniscience); teller-character and reflector-character as agents of transmission (telling/showing). The structural significance of these basic oppositions emerges from the observation that a transformation of a narrative text determined by one pole of one of these oppositions into a text dominated by its opposite elements usually alters the meaning of the narrative. In this way the central chapters of the Theorie attempt a verification of the structural significance of these oppositions. Illustrations are drawn mainly from English, American and German novels, ranging from DeFoe, Sterne, and Goethe, to Thomas Mann, Faulkner, Joyce, Beckett, M. Frisch, and Vonnegut. In the teller/reflector opposition we perceive two contrary manifestations of mediacy…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stanzel's distinction between teller-characters and reflector-characters can be equated with Genette's narrator and focalizer, respectively.
“Stanzel (1981) makes a central distinction in modes of narration by dividing narrating characters to teller-characters and reflector-characters. These can be equated with Genette ' s (1988) narrator and focalizer, respectively.”
From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Stanzel (1981)
First-person narrators that do not verbalize their thoughts are not teller-characters if they do not communicate with the reader, but only talk to themselves.
“First-person narrators that do not verbalize their thoughts are not teller-characters, if they do not communicate with the reader, but only talk to themselves (Stanzel, 1981).”
From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Stanzel, 1981
The distinction between teller-characters and reflector-characters does not necessarily follow the division to first- and third-person narrators.
“The distinction between teller-characters and reflector-characters does not necessarily follow the division to first- and third-person narrators.”
From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Stanzel, 1981
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games
Arjoranta, J. (2018) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/uep74 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stanzel, F. K.
- Corresponding author
- Stanzel, Franz K.
- Venue
- Poetics Today
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1981
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 5
- ISSN
- 0333-5372 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2319810791
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Poetics Today (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Short Stories in Global Literature
- Keywords
- narrative theory, narrative transmission, narrator, first-person narration, third-person narration, omniscience, fictionality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review