The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170
Epidemiology and the web of causation: has anyone seen the spider?
Krieger, N. (1994) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90202-x · Cited by 1,419
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism
Phillips, D. C. (1995) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x024007005 · Cited by 1,330
Yvonne Feilzer, M. (2010) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689809349691 · Cited by 1,258
A theory of migration: the aspirations-capabilities framework
de Haas, H. (2021) · Comparative Migration Studies · doi:10.1186/s40878-020-00210-4 · Cited by 1,137
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, M. B., & Kuhn, T. S.
- Venue
- The American Historical Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1963-04
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 700
- ISSN
- 0002-8762 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2752714680
- Cited by
- 7,479
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 48.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1847040
- The paper
- Hall, M. B., & Kuhn, T. S. (1963). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The American Historical Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1847040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
