The DOI matches its Crossref record.
And We Are Not Saved: The Elusive Quest for Racial Justice
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Just what is critical race theory and what's it doing in a nice field like education?
Ladson-Billings, G. (1998) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/095183998236863 · Cited by 3,186
Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability
Annamma, S. A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2012.730511 · Cited by 1,272
Critical Race Theory, Racial Microaggressions, and Campus Racial Climate for Latina/o Undergraduates
Yosso, T., Smith, W., Ceja, M., & Solórzano, D. (2009) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.79.4.m6867014157m707l · Cited by 1,221
Critical Race Theory and the Whiteness of Teacher Education
Sleeter, C. E. (2017) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085916668957 · Cited by 699
Harper, S. R. (2009) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518390903333889 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Tushnet, M. V., & Bell, D.
- Venue
- The American Historical Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1988-12
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1386
- ISSN
- 0002-8762 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034399915
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: And We Are Not Saved: The Elusive Quest for Racial Justice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1873677
- The paper
- Tushnet, M. V., & Bell, D. (1988). And We Are Not Saved: The Elusive Quest for Racial Justice. The American Historical Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1873677
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
