Cited by 629Advanced Statistical Methods and ModelsSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisStatistical and numerical algorithms

Partial Time Regressions as Compared with Individual Trends

Frisch, Ragnar, Waugh, Frederick V.·1933·Econometrica

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1907330

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Estimating the static TWFE model is equivalent to estimating the residualized regression by the Frisch-Waugh-Lovell theorem.

    “One way of thinking about this disappointing result is through the Frisch-Waugh-Lovell (FWL) theorem (Frisch and Waugh 1933). This theorem says that estimating the Static TWFE model is equivalent to estimating”

    From did2s: Two-Stage Difference-in-Differences (2022) · cites this paper as Frisch and Waugh 1933

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frisch, R., & Waugh, F. V.
Venue
Econometrica
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1933-10
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
387
ISSN
0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2318460400
Cited by
629
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 20
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Econometrica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
Keywords
trend estimation, time series decomposition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review