The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Sensitivity of Consumption to Transitory Income: Estimates from Panel Data on Households
Abstract
We investigate the stochastic relation between income and consumption (specifically, consumption of food) within a panel of about 2,000 households. Our major findings are: 1. Consumption responds much more strongly to permanent than to transitory movements of income. 2. The response to transitory income is nonetheless clearly positive. 3. A simple test, independent of our model of consumption, rejects a central implication of the pure life cycle-permanent income hypothesis. The observed covariation of income and consumption is compatible with pure life cycle-permanent income behavior on the part of80 percent of families and simple proportionality of consumption and income among the remaining 20 percent. As a general matter, our findings support the view that families respond differently to different sources of income variations. In particular, temporary income tax policies have smaller effects on consumption than do other, more permanent changes in income of the same magnitude.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting
Laibson, D. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555253 · Cited by 6,122
Anomalies: Saving, Fungibility, and Mental Accounts
Thaler, R. H. (1990) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.4.1.193 · Cited by 957
Gross, D. B., & Souleles, N. S. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302753399472 · Cited by 867
The Consumption Response to Income Changes
Jappelli, T., & Pistaferri, L. (2010) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.142933 · Cited by 704
Havranek, T., & Sokolova, A. (2020) · Review of Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.red.2019.05.004 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, R. E., & Mishkin, F. S.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982-03
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 461
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083158139
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 52.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.