Cited by 6,122Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisEconomic theories and models

Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting

Open access
Laibson, D.·1997·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

Hyperbolic discount functions induce dynamically inconsistent preferences, implying a motive for consumers to constrain their own future choices. This paper analyzes the decisions of a hyperbolic consumer who has access to an imperfect commitment technology: an illiquid asset whose sale must be initiated one period before the sale proceeds are received. The model predicts that consumption tracks income, and the model explains why consumers have asset-specific marginal propensities to consume. The model suggests that financial innovation may have caused the ongoing decline in U. S. savings rates, since financial innovation increases liquidity, eliminating commitment opportunities. Finally, the model implies that financial market innovation may reduce welfare by providing "too much" liquidity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/003355397555253

Cites

33 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If there is a choice, individuals usually choose a small benefit in the short term over a larger benefit in the longer term.

    “If there is a choice, individuals usually choose a small benefit in the short term over a larger benefit in the longer term.”

    From The privacy paradox – investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – a systematic literature review (2017) · cites this paper as Laibson, 1997

    The Introduction describes a high short-term discount rate and gives an example of postponing savings to avoid an immediate sacrifice. That supports a preference for near-term benefits in some circumstances, but the paper does not establish that individuals usually choose a smaller near-term benefit over a larger later one whenever offered that choice. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. --, "Beyond Microeconomics. Conflict among Interests in a Multiple Self as a Determinant of Value." in The Multiple Self, Jon Elster, ed. (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986).
  2. Chung, Shin-Ho, and Richard J. Herrnstein, "Relative and Absolute Strengths of Response as a Function of Frequency of Reinforcement," Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Animal Behavior, IV (1961), 267-72.
  3. Daniel Houser. 2010. A Note on Norms in Experimental Economics. Eastern Economic Journal 34:1, 126-128. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Isabelle Brocas. 2009. Dynamic inconsistency and choice. Theory and Decision . [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Matthias Wrede. 2009. Hyperbolic discounting and fertility. Journal of Population Economics . [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Amanda Swift King, John T. King. 2009. Golden eggs versus plastic eggs: hyperbolic preferences and the persistence of debit. Journal of Economics and Finance . [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Francis A Longstaff. 2009. Portfolio Claustrophobia: Asset Pricing in Markets with Illiquid Assets. American Economic Review 99:4, 1119-1144. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. C. Leigh ANDERSON, Mary Kay GUGERTY. 2009. INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE AND DEVELOPMENT POLICY: NEW EVIDENCE ON TIME-VARYING DISCOUNT RATES FROM VIETNAM AND RUSSIA. The Developing Economies 47:2, 123-146. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Linda G. Martin. 2009. Interventions to Improve Late Life. Population and Development Review 35:2, 331-340. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Alessandro Tarozzi, Aprajit Mahajan, Joanne Yoong, Brian Blackburn. 2009. Commitment Mechanisms and Compliance with Health-Protecting Behavior: Preliminary Evidence from Orissa, India. American Economic Review 99:2, 231-235. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Paul Heidhues , Botond Kőszegi . 2009. Futile Attempts at Self-ControlFutile Attempts at Self-Control. Journal of the European Economic Association 7:2-3, 423-434. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus] · DOI
  12. B. Douglas Bernheim . 2009. Behavioral Welfare EconomicsBehavioral Welfare Economics. Journal of the European Economic Association 7:2-3, 267-319. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus] · DOI
  13. Michael Dothan, Fred Thompson. 2009. A better budget rule. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 28:3, 463-478. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. PDF] [PDF Plus] [Supplementary material] · DOI
  15. Randall P. Ellis, Elizabeth Savage. 2009. Run for cover now or later? The impact of premiums, threats and deadlines on private health insurance in Australia. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics 8:4, 257-277. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Abigail Barr , Garance Genicot . 2008. Risk Sharing, Commitment, and Information: An Experimental AnalysisRisk Sharing, Commitment, and Information: An Experimental Analysis. Journal of the European Economic Association 6:6, 1151-1185. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus] · DOI
  17. Ferdinando Colombo, Guido Merzoni. 2008. For how long to tie your hands? Stable relationships in an unstable environment. Journal of Economics 95:2, 93-120. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Bernd Huber, Marco Runkel. 2008. HYPERBOLIC DISCOUNTING, PUBLIC DEBT AND BALANCED BUDGET RULES. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 55:5, 543-560. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Jukka Pirttilä, Sanna Tenhunen. 2008. Pawns and queens revisited: public provision of private goods when individuals make mistakes. International Tax and Public Finance 15:5, 599-619. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Ivar Ekeland, Traian A. Pirvu. 2008. Investment and consumption without commitment. Mathematics and Financial Economics 2:1, 57-86. [CrossRef] · DOI
  21. MICHAEL R. CAPUTO. 2008. THE INTRINSIC QUALITATIVE PROPERTIES OF THE CLASSICAL OPTIMAL STOPPING PROBLEM ARE INVARIANT TO THE FUNCTIONAL FORM OF THE DISCOUNT FUNCTION. Natural Resource Modelling . [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Enrica Carbone. 2008. Temptations and Dynamic Consistency. Theory and Decision 64:2-3, 229-248. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Hiroshi Fujiu, Makoto Yano. 2008. Altruism as a motive for intergenerational transfers. International Journal of Economic Theory 4:1, 95-114. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Michelle J White. 2008. Bankruptcy Reform and Credit Cards. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21:4, 175-199. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Yih-Luan Chyi, Yu-Lun Liu. 2007. Income Uncertainty and Wealth Accumulation: How Precautionary are Taiwanese Households?. Asian Economic Journal 21:3, 301-319. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Daniel R. Burghart, Trudy Ann Cameron, Geoffrey R. Gerdes. 2007. Valuing publicly sponsored research projects: Risks, scenario adjustments, and inattention. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 35:1, 77-105. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Herbert Gintis. 2007. Review 2 Economic Growth and Wellbeing: A Behavioural Analysis. The Economic Journal 117:521, 455-459. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. ALAIN AYONG LE KAMA, KATHELINE SCHUBERT. 2007. A NOTE ON THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ENDOGENOUS DISCOUNTING DEPENDING ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. Macroeconomic Dynamics 11:02. . [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Mary Kay Gugerty. 2007. You Can't Save Alone: Commitment in Rotating Savings and Credit Associations in Kenya. Economic Development and Cultural Change 55:2, 251-282. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Marina Azzimonti, Eva de Francisco, Per Krusell. 2007. Median-voter Equilibria in the Neoclassical Growth Model under Aggregation. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 108:4, 587-606. [CrossRef] · DOI
  31. Jeremy Clark, Bonggeun Kim, Richie Poulton, Barry Milne. 2006. The role of low expectations in health and education investment and hazardous consumption. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'economique 39:4, 1151-1172. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Botond Köszegi, Matthew Rabin. 2006. A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences*A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences*. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121:4, 1133-1165. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus] · DOI · Paper page
  33. P. Jean-Jacques Herings, Kirsten I. M. Rohde. 2006. Time-inconsistent preferences in a general equilibrium model. Economic Theory 29:3, 591-619. [CrossRef] · DOI
  34. JOSEPH HEATH. 2006. The Benefits of Cooperation. Philosophy <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Public Affairs 34:4, 313-351. [CrossRef] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laibson, D.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Laibson, D.
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
1997-05-01
Volume
112
Issue
2
Pages
443-478
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2118052532
Cited by
6,122
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 239 · 2025: 252 · 2024: 239 · 2023: 258 · 2022: 243 · 2021: 274 · 2020: 394 · 2019: 332 · 2018: 317 · 2017: 290 · 2016: 323 · 2015: 327 · 2014: 313 · 2013: 280 · 2012: 253
FWCI
21.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9510985)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
Keywords
hyperbolic discounting, time inconsistency, imperfect commitment, illiquid assets, consumption smoothing, marginal propensity to consume, financial innovation, savings rate, liquidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review