The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Determinants of Trade Credit in the U.S. Total Manufacturing Sector
Abstract
This paper estimates a model specifying the determinants of trade credit in the United States total manufacturing sector for the postwar period. Trade credit is considered as a selling expense, like advertising outlays. Its determinants are derived from a profit maximization model in which the price, volume of output, and the selling costs are all variables to be jointly determined. The opportunity or cost of accounts receivable and accounts payable are specified and the response of these accounts as well as net trade credit to changes in various monetary decision variables is examined. TRADE CREDIT HAS been a major and growing source of finance in all sectors of the United States economy since World War II. Its volume and widespread use have not been matched by any other kind of business financing. Yet trade credit, like other components of working capital, has received little attention in the literature. One reason for this neglect is that trade credit is buried in the distribution activity of the firm, and sorting out the complex institutional factors that influence its behavior is extremely difficult. The few available studies on the subject have been concerned primarily with assessing the response of trade credit to changes in monetary policy. Rarely has attention been given to developing an optimal model of trade credit based on the theory of the firm, to specifying the opportunity cost of extending or receiving trade credit, or to incorporating the influence of changes in the monetary policy instruments on the optimal level of trade credit. In this paper we attempt to analyze these three problems. The brief discussion in Section 2 introduces the issues. The theoretical framework for the study is sketched in Section 3. In Section 3a, the concept of opportunity or user costs of accounts receivable and payable is developed. The relationship and response of these forms of trade credit to changes in monetary policy are discussed in Section 3b. The adjustment process is formulated in Section 3c. The empirical results of the model for accounts receivable, accounts payable, and net trade credit, i.e., the difference between accounts receivable and payable, are presented and analyzed in Section 4. The paper is concluded with a summary and an appendix describing the data sources and definitions of the variables used in the study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What You Sell Is What You Lend? Explaining Trade Credit Contracts
Giannetti, M., Burkart, M., & Ellingsen, T. (2011) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn096 · Cited by 938
Trade Credit and Informational Asymmetry
SMITH, J. K. (1987) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb03916.x · Cited by 880
Trade Credit and the Bank Lending Channel
Nilsen, J. H. (2002) · Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking · doi:10.1353/mcb.2002.0032 · Cited by 622
An economic model of trade credit
Schwartz, R. A. (1974) · The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.2307/2329765 · Cited by 612
A transactions theory of trade credit use
Ferris, J. S. (1981) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1882390 · Cited by 603
Metadata
- Authors
- Nadiri, M. I.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1969-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 408
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147474915
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Determinants of Trade Credit in the U.S. Total Manufacturing Sector. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1912790
- The paper
- Nadiri, M. I. (1969). The Determinants of Trade Credit in the U.S. Total Manufacturing Sector. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912790
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.