Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,821

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Temporal Resolution of Uncertainty and Dynamic Choice Theory

Kreps, David M., Porteus, Evan L.·1978·Econometrica

Abstract

We consider dynamic choice behavior under conditions of uncertainty, with emphasis on the timing of the resolution of uncertainty.Choice behavior in which an individual distinguishes between lotteries based on the times at which their uncertainty resolves is axiomatized and represented, thus the result is choice behavior which cannot be represented by a single cardinal utility function on the vector of payoffs.Both descriptive and normative treatments of the problem are given and are shown to be equivalent.Various specializations are provided, including an extension of "separable" utility and representation by a single cardinal utility function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1913656

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,821

Metadata

Authors
Kreps, D. M., & Porteus, E. L.
Venue
Econometrica
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1978-01
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
185
ISSN
0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132807882
Cited by
1,821
References
0
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal Resolution of Uncertainty and Dynamic Choice Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1913656
The paper
Kreps, D. M., & Porteus, E. L. (1978). Temporal Resolution of Uncertainty and Dynamic Choice Theory. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913656

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.