Cited by 7,732Monetary Policy and Economic ImpactMarket Dynamics and VolatilityDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies

The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis

Perron, Pierre·1989·Econometrica

Abstract

We consider the null hypothesis that a time series has a unit root with possibly nonzero drift against the alternative that the process is «trend-stationary». The interest is that we allow under both the null and alternative hypotheses for the presence for a one-time change in the level or in the slope of the trend function. We show how standard tests of the unit root hypothesis against trend stationary alternatives cannot reject the unit root hypothesis if the true data generating mechanism is that of stationary fluctuations around a trend function which contains a one-time break

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1913712

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perron, P.
Venue
Econometrica
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1989-11
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
1361
ISSN
0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116388354
Cited by
7,732
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 215 · 2025: 186 · 2024: 222 · 2023: 245 · 2022: 299 · 2021: 295 · 2020: 300 · 2019: 290 · 2018: 259 · 2017: 266 · 2016: 271 · 2015: 268 · 2014: 287 · 2013: 304 · 2012: 345
FWCI
119.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Econometrica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Keywords
unit root hypothesis, trend stationarity, structural breaks, oil price shocks, time series stationarity, drift, unit root tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review