Cited by 598Energy, Environment, Economic GrowthEconomic Growth and ProductivityMarket Dynamics and Volatility

Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis

Open access
Shahbaz, Muhammad, Hoang, Thi Hong Van, Mahalik, Mantu Kumar, Roubaud, David·2017·Energy Economics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.023

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a nonlinear relationship between financial development and economic growth in India, and only negative shocks to finance have impacts on economic growth.

    “Shahbaz et al. (2017) identified a nonlinear relationship between financial development and economic growth in India and argued that only negative shocks to finance have impacts on economic growth.”

    From Financial Inclusion and Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa—A Panel ARDL and Granger Non-Causality Approach (2023) · cites this paper as Shahbaz et al. (2017)

    The Conclusion says the finance–growth relationship in India is asymmetric: positive shocks do not affect growth, while negative shocks hamper it. However, the Cointegration results (§4.2) also report a significant negative effect of positive financial-development shocks on long-term growth. Thus, the unqualified claim that only negative shocks have impacts overstates the paper's findings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Acaravci, A., Erdogan, S., Akalin, G., 2015. The electricity consumption, real income, trade openness and foreign direct investment: The empirical evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 5(4), 1050-1057.
  2. Adams, F.G., Miovic, P., 1986. On relative fuel efficiency and the output elasticity of energy consumption in Western Europe. The Journal of Industrial Economics, November.
  3. Altay, B., Topcu, M., 2015. Relationship between financial development and energy consumption. Bulletin of Energy Economics 3(1), 18-24.
  4. Asghar, Z., 2008. Energy-GDP relationship: a causal analysis for the five countries of South Asia. Applied Econometrics and International Development Journal 8(2), 101-109.
  5. Bayer, C., Hanck, C., 2013. Combining non-cointegration tests. Journal of Time Series Analysis 19(3), 267-283.
  6. Cheng, B. S., 1999. Causality between energy consumption and economic growth in India: an application of cointegration and error-correction modeling. Indian Economic Review 34(1), 39-49.
  7. Denton, F.T., 1971. Adjustment of Monthly or Quarterly Series to Annual Totals: An Approach Based on Quadratic Minimization. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66(333), 92-102.
  8. Destek, M.A., 2015. Energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade openness in Turkey: Maki cointegration test. Bulletin of Energy Economics 3(4), 162-168.
  9. Dogan, E., 2014. Energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from low-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 4(2), 154-162.
  10. Dogan, E., 2016a. The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption and trade. Bulletin of Energy Economics 4(1), 70-80.
  11. Khan, N.A., Fozia, 2013. Growth and development in Indian banking sector. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences Research 2(2), 197-211.
  12. Kraft, J., Kraft, A., 1978. On the relationship between energy and GNP. The Journal of Energy and Development 3, 401-403.
  13. Magazzino, C., 2015. Energy consumption and GDP in Italy: cointegration and causality analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability 17(1), 137-153.
  14. McGoven, J., 1998. Why bad loans happen to good banks. The Journal of Commercial Lending. Philadelphia: Feb 1993. Vol. 75, Issue.
  15. Mehrara, M., Musai, M., 2012. Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth: a ARDL approach for the case of Iran. Journal of Business Behavioral Sciences 2(6), 92-99.
  16. Mehta, R., 2011. Short-run and long-run relationship between capital formation and economic growth in India. Indian Journal of Management and Technology 19, 170-180.
  17. Mohan, R., 2003. Transforming Indian banking: In search of a better tomorrow'. Reserve Bank of India. Speeches, Reserve Bank of India Bulletin, January.
  18. Rasche, R., Tatom, J., 1977. Energy resources and potential GNP. Federal Reserve of St Louis Review 59(6), 10-24.
  19. Rashid, A., Yousaf, N., 2015. Linkage of financial development with electricity growth, nexus of India and Pakistan. Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics 2(34), 151-160.
  20. Reddy, Y.V., 2004. Credit policy, systems, and culture. Reserve Bank of India Bulletin, March.
  21. Sa'ad, S., 2010. Energy consumption and economic growth: causality relationship for Nigeria. OPEC Energy Review March, 15-24.
  22. Shahbaz, M., 2015. Electricity consumption, financial development and economic growth nexus in Pakistan: a visit. Bulletin of Energy Economics 3(2), 48-65.
  23. Shin, Y., Yu, B., Greenwood-Nimmo, M., 2014. Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in an ARDL framework. In: Horrace, W.C., Sickles, R.C., (Eds.), Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt, Springer Science and Business Media, New York.
  24. Solow, R.M., 1974. The economics of resources or the resources of economics. American Economic Review 64, 1-14.
  25. Sergio, M., 1996. Non-performing bank loans: Cyclical patterns and sectoral risk. Review of Economic Conditions in Italy (1),
  26. Warren, J.C., 1964. Energy and economic advances. The Philippine Economic Journal, First Semester.
  27. World Bank, 1994. World development report 1994. Infrastructure for development. New York: Oxford University Press.
  28. Yu, E., Choi, J., 1985. The causal relationship between energy and GNP: An international comparison. Journal of Energy and Development 10, 249-272.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shahbaz, M., Hoang, T. H. V., Mahalik, M. K., & Roubaud, D.
Affiliations
  • MBS School of Business (FR)
  • National Institute of Technology Rourkela (IN)
Venue
Energy Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
63
Pages
199-212
ISSN
0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2587762325
Cited by
598
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 120 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
88.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy Economics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Sussex
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
Keywords
energy consumption, economic growth, financial development, capital formation, labor force, asymmetric causality, nonlinear cointegration, production function, India, growth policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review