Cited by 65Advanced Statistical Methods and ModelsStatistical and numerical algorithmsStatistical Methods and Applications

The Treatment of Linear Restrictions in Regression Analysis

Chipman, John S., Rao, M. M.·1964·Econometrica

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1913745

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eq. (2) can be fitted subject to linear equality restrictions, which would reduce the number of parameters to be estimated.

    “First, Eq. (2) can be fitted subject to linear equality restrictions, which would reduce the number of parameters to be estimated [56,57].”

    From Syndemics and Health Disparities: A Methodological Note (2016) · cites this paper as [57]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chipman, J. S., & Rao, M. M.
Venue
Econometrica
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1964-01
Volume
32
Issue
1/2
Pages
198
ISSN
0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2327560351
Cited by
64
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Econometrica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
linear restrictions, regression analysis, hypothesis testing, constrained least squares

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review