The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Demand for Cigarettes: Advertising, the Health Scare, and the Cigarette Advertising Ban
Abstract
IN this paper I have esitimated the amount United States cigarette consumption has been affected by cigarette advertising and by the health scare over smoking. During 19531970 the health scare depressed cigarette consumption considerably more than cigarette advertising boosted it. Section I presents econometric estimations of the demand function for cigarettes, incorporating econometric corrections for multicollinearity. Section II gauges the comparative effects of advertising and the health scare. On these results, section III evaluates whether the recent Congressional ban of broadcast advertising of cigarettes will promote public health by reducing cigarette consumption. Although the advertising elasticity of demand was positive, it was quite small. More importantly, however, the ban also eliminated the health-scare-oriented antismoking commercials, which the Federal Communications Commission had forced broadcasters to air in proportion to cigarette commercials. Since the health scare has been the relatively stronger influence, the net effect of the ban may be to increase consumption, not decrease it. Ban advocates disregarded the interconnection of cigarette and antismoking commercials; the United States cigarette manufacturers apparently were not confused about the interconnection. Finally, the probable anti-competitive effects of the ban are noted in section IV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multicollinearity in Regression Analysis: The Problem Revisited
Farrar, D. E., & Glauber, R. R. (1967) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1937887 · Cited by 1,932
Telser, L. G. (1964) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/258962 · Cited by 416
Price Elasticity of the Demand for Cigarettes in the United States
Lyon, H. L., & Simon, J. L. (1968) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.2307/1237626 · Cited by 29
Cited by
Health Behavior, Health Knowledge, and Schooling
Kenkel, D. S. (1991) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261751 · Cited by 956
Obesity and the Economics of Prevention: Fit not Fat
OECD (2010) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/9789264084865-en · Cited by 720
Hopkins, D. P., Briss, P. A., Ricard, C. J., Husten, C. G., Carande-Kulis, V. G., Fielding, J. E., Alao, M. O., McKenna, J. W., Sharp, D. J., Harris, J. R., et al. (2001) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00297-x · Cited by 453
The effect of tobacco advertising bans on tobacco consumption
Saffer, H., & Chaloupka, F. (2000) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00054-0 · Cited by 441
Chapter 29 The economics of smoking
Chaloupka, F. J., & Warner, K. E. (2000) · Handbook of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/s1574-0064(00)80042-6 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamilton, J. L.
- Venue
- The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1972-11
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 401
- ISSN
- 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021409178
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Demand for Cigarettes: Advertising, the Health Scare, and the Cigarette Advertising Ban. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1924567
- The paper
- Hamilton, J. L. (1972). The Demand for Cigarettes: Advertising, the Health Scare, and the Cigarette Advertising Ban. The Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924567
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.