The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Eruption of Ungulate Populations, with Emphasis on Himalayan Thar in New Zealand
Abstract
An eruptive fluctuation is defined operationally as an increase in numbers over at least two generations, followed by a marked decline. Reported eruptions in ungulates suggest that the upswing is initiated by a change in food or habitat and is terminated by overgrazing. An apparent exception–the Kaibab eruption–probably also fits this pattern. The interpretation causally linking reduction of predators on the plateau with increase of deer is an overstatement of evidence. Eruption of established populations is essentially the same process as the buildup of populations initiated by liberation, with the difference that in the second case a zone of high density migrates radially from the point of liberation. Eruption of thar (a goat—like bovid) after liberation in New Zealand was studied by sampling populations at different distances from the point of liberation. The aim was to determine trend of demographic statistics across an eruptive fluctuation that spans 50 years. Although fecundity varied across the eruption, the major influence on rate of increase was traced to variation in death rate. The major component of this variation was the rate of mortality over the first year of life. Trend in death rate, and hence in rate of increase, was associated with trends in other population statistics that are easier to measure. The most useful correlative of rate of increase is probably the level of fat reserves. While we do not know whether trends in population statistics of thar reflect those of other ungulates during an eruptive fluctuation, the generality of the reported trends may usefully serve as a testable hypothesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exploitation Ecosystems in Gradients of Primary Productivity
Oksanen, L., Fretwell, S. D., Arruda, J., & Niemela, P. (1981) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283817 · Cited by 1,767
Temporal Variation in Fitness Components and Population Dynamics of Large Herbivores
Gaillard, J.-M., Festa-Bianchet, M., Yoccoz, N. G., Loison, A., & Toïgo, C. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.367 · Cited by 1,729
Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the consumer connection
Duffy, J. E. (2002) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990201.x · Cited by 653
Food regulates the Serengeti wildebeest: a 40-year record.
Mduma, S. A. R., Sinclair, A. R. E., & Hilborn, R. (1999) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00352.x · Cited by 434
Martin, P. S. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.179.4077.969 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Caughley, G.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1970-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-72
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2158317226
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eruption of Ungulate Populations, with Emphasis on Himalayan Thar in New Zealand. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1933599
- The paper
- Caughley, G. (1970). Eruption of Ungulate Populations, with Emphasis on Himalayan Thar in New Zealand. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1933599
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.