Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Wildland Fires and Ecosystems‐‐A Hypothesis

Mutch, Robert W.·1970·Ecology

Abstract

Plant species which have survived fires for tens of thousands of years may not only have selected survival mechanisms, but also inherent flammable properties that contribute to the perpetuation of fire—dependent plant communities. This concept goes by beyond the commonly accepted fire climate—fuel moisture basis of wildland fire occurrence. Plant communities may be ignited accidentally or randomly, but the character of burning is not random. The following hypothesis treats this interaction between fire and the ecosystem: Fire—dependent plant communities burn more readily than non—fire—dependent communities because natural selection has favored development of characteristics that make them more flammable. The hypothesis was experimentally derived following laboratory combustion tests with litter of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus obliqua L'Herit), ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Laws.), and tropical hardwood leaves.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1933631

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Mutch, R. W.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1970-11
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
1046-1051
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2022822200
Cited by
498
References
0
FWCI
18.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wildland Fires and Ecosystems‐‐A Hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1933631
The paper
Mutch, R. W. (1970). Wildland Fires and Ecosystems‐‐A Hypothesis. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1933631

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.