The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time and Energy Budgets of Territorial Hummingbirds
Abstract
From laboratory data of flying and resting metabolism and field data on time budgets of territorial male Eulampis jugularis hummingbirds we were able to estimate caloric energy budgets associated with territorial behavior. The relative time and energy expenditures for territorial defense, foraging, and sitting varied in territories with different species of flowers. For example, territories centered around banana flowers had lower foraging costs than those centered around Myrtaceae or Inga—Hibiscus. The costs for flycatching, hovering,and perch changes accounted for relatively little of the time and energy budgets at any of the territorial defense and foraging were expended in sitting on perches within the territory. Territorial defense was of relatively low cost in time and energy because of the inactive defense utilized by Eulampis. Selection will optimize time and/or energy budgets, but the type of budget optimized will depend in large part on the exploitation technique of the species. For birds that do not fly to forage, but exploit food items that require a long search time per calorie, time that can be released for other activities may be more important than major shifts in energy budgeting. For hummingbirds, however, optimizing energy may be more important to insure a positive energy budget.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment
MacArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282454 · Cited by 4,593
A re-examination of the relation between standard metabolic rate and body weight in birds
Lasiewski, R. C., & Dawson, W. R. (1967) · The Condor · doi:10.2307/1366368 · Cited by 816
Cited by
Ecology and Management of Breeding Waterfowl
Ratti, J. T., Batt, B. D. J., Afton, A. D., Anderson, M. G., Ankney, C. D., Johnson, D. H., Kadlec, J. A., & Krapu, G. L. (1994) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3809573 · Cited by 938
Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: The moose
Belovsky, G. E. (1978) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(78)90007-2 · Cited by 639
Economics of Feeding Territoriality in the Golden‐Winged Sunbird
Gill, F. B., & Wolf, L. L. (1975) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1934964 · Cited by 531
Self-citationHuman Territoriality: An Ecological Reassessment
Dyson‐Hudson, R., & Smith, E. A. (1978) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1978.80.1.02a00020 · Cited by 475
Heinrich, B. (1975) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.001035 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolf, L. L., & Hainsworth, F. R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1971-11
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 980-988
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2082791174
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time and Energy Budgets of Territorial Hummingbirds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1933803
- The paper
- Wolf, L. L., & Hainsworth, F. R. (1971). Time and Energy Budgets of Territorial Hummingbirds. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1933803
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.