The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human Territoriality: An Ecological Reassessment
Abstract
The question of human territoriality has frequently been debated, but most previous discussions have not sufficiently emphasized ecological variables as major factors determining territoriality. We argue that current theories in sociobiology, especially the model focusing on economic defendability of resources, need to be considered in analyzing human territoriality. According to this model, territoriality is expected to occur when critical resources are sufficiently abundant and predictable in space and time, so that costs of exclusive use and defense of an area are outweighed by the benefits gained from resource control. This model is developed, and then applied to several locally adapted human populations (Northern Ojibwa, Basin‐Plateau Indians, and Karimojong). Variations in territorial responses for these groups seem to accord with the predictions of the economic defendability model. [territoriality, resource defense, human ecology, sociobiology, spatial organization]
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ecological theory suggests that individuals should only defend habitats from incoming settlers if the benefits of doing so are worth the costs.
“Ecological theory suggests that individuals should only defend habitats from incoming settlers if the benefits of doing so are worth the costs (Brown 1969;Dyson-Hudson and Smith 1978).”
From The Ideal Distribution Model and Archaeological Settlement Patterning (2022) · cites this paper as Dyson-Hudson and Smith 1978
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 66
- Ardrey Robert, 1966, The Territorial Imperative
- 10.1007/BF01793893 · DOI
- 10.2307/3772698 · DOI
- Bishop Charles A., 1974, The Northern Ojibwa and the Fur Trade: An Historical and Ecological Study
- Brown Jerram L., 1964, The Evolution of Diversity in Avian Territorial Systems, Wilson Bulletin, 76, 160
- 10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.001323 · DOI
- 10.2307/1374834 · DOI
- Carpenter C. R., 1958, Behavior and Evolution, 224
- 10.1086/201669 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1939.41.1.02a00060 · DOI
- Crook J. H., 1970, Social Behavior in Birds and Mammals, xxi
- Crook J. H., 1972, Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971, 231
- Crook J. H., 1973, Man and Aggression, 183
- Damas David ed.1969Conference on Band Societies. National Museum of Canada Bulletin 228.
- 10.1525/aa.1971.73.1.02a00060 · DOI
- Dumond Don E., 1972, Population Growth: Anthropological Implications, 286
- 10.1086/409471 · DOI
- 10.1086/404979 · DOI
- 10.1177/002190967200700103 · DOI
- 10.1038/scientificamerican0269-76 · DOI
- Dyson‐Hudson Rada, 1970, African Food Production Systems: Cases and Theory, 91
- 10.1126/science.176.4037.863 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1145188 · DOI
- Esser A. H., 1971, Behavior and Environment: The Use of Space by Animals and Men, 10.1007/978-1-4684-1893-4 · DOI
- 10.2307/1934964 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1949.51.1.02a00040 · DOI
- 10.2307/1935050 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.001403 · DOI
- 10.1080/00438243.1977.9979673 · DOI
- Heinz H. J., 1972, Territoriality among the Bushmen in General and the !Ko in Particular, Anthropos, 67, 405
- Hinde Robert A., 1956, The Biological Significance of the Territories of Birds, Anthropos, 98, 340
- 10.2307/1935532 · DOI
- 10.1086/jar.31.1.3629508 · DOI
- 10.1016/0047-2484(76)90035-X · DOI
- Klopfer P. H., 1969, Habitats and Territories: A Study of the Use of Space by Animals
- Knight Rolf, 1965, Man, Culture, and Animals, 27
- Lack David, 1968, Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds
- 10.5962/bhl.title.35991 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01531351 · DOI
- Lee Richard B., 1968, Man the Hunter
- Levins Richard, 1966, The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology, American Scientist, 54, 421
- Martin M. K., 1974, Module in Anthropology
- 10.1525/aa.1975.77.1.02a00040 · DOI · Paper page
- Pianka Eric R., 1974, Evolutionary Ecology
- 10.1002/j.1834-4461.1930.tb00003.x · DOI
- 10.2307/2798339 · DOI
- Reynolds Vernon, 1965, Primate Behavior, 368
- Service Elman R., 1962, Primitive Social Organization
- Service Elman R., 1971, Primitive Social Organization
- Service Elman R., 1975, Origins of the State and Civilization
- 10.2307/1942287 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1915.17.2.02a00070 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1923.25.4.02a00030 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1939.41.2.02a00080 · DOI
- Steward Julian H., 1955, Theory of Culture Change, 101
- Thomas David H., 1972, Great Basin Cultural Ecology: A Symposium, 135
- 10.2307/279362 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1974.76.1.02a00030 · DOI
- 10.1080/00063655709475864 · DOI
- Ward P., 1973, The Importance of Certain Assemblages of Birds as “Information‐Centres” for Food‐Finding, Bird Study, 115, 517
- Williams B. J., 1974, A Model of Band Society
- 10.1086/jar.29.1.3629622 · DOI
- Wilson Edward O., 1971, Man and Beast: Comparative Social Behavior, 181
- Wilson Edward O., 1975, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis
- 10.2307/1933803 · DOI
- Zahavi A., 1971, The Social Behavior of the White Wagtail Wintering in Israel, Ecology, 113, 203
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hunter-gatherers and human evolution.
Marlowe, F. W. (2005) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20046 · Cited by 944
The Origin of Modern Human Behavior: Critique of the Models and Their Test Implications
Henshilwood, C. S., & Marean, C. W. (2003) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/377665 · Cited by 735
Social networks and information: Non-“utilitarian” mobility among hunter-gatherers
Whallon, R. (2006) · Journal of Anthropological Archaeology · doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2005.11.004 · Cited by 379
The evolutionary and ecological roots of human social organization
Kaplan, H. S., Hooper, P. L., & Gurven, M. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0115 · Cited by 353
Prehistoric human impacts on Rapa, French Polynesia
Kennett, D., Anderson, A., Prebble, M., Conte, E., & Southon, J. (2006) · Antiquity · doi:10.1017/s0003598x00093662 · Cited by 85
Marom, N., & Bar-Oz, G. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055958 · Cited by 56
The Ideal Distribution Model and Archaeological Settlement Patterning
Weitzel, E. M., & Codding, B. F. (2022) · Environmental Archaeology · doi:10.1080/14614103.2020.1803015 · Cited by 49
Rogers Flattery, C. N., Coppeto, D. J., Inoue, K., Rilling, J. K., Preuss, T. M., & Young, L. J. (2022) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-021-02369-7 · Cited by 31
Aceituno Bocanegra, F. J., & Uriarte González, A. (2019) · Trabajos De Prehistoria · doi:10.3989/tp.2019.12234 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Dyson‐Hudson, R., & Smith, E. A.
- Venue
- American Anthropologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1978-03
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-41
- ISSN
- 0002-7294
- 1548-1433
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review