Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Migration and Metabolism in a Temperate Stream Ecosystem

Hall, Charles A. S.·1972·Ecology

Abstract

Fish migration, total stream metabolism, and phosphous were studies in New Hope Creek, North Carolina, from April 1968 to June 1970. Upstream and downstream movement of fish was monitored using weirs with traps. Most of the 27 species had a consistent pattern of larger fish moving upstream and smaller fish moving downstream. Both upstream and downstream movements were greatest in the spring. For example, in the spring of 1969, a daily average of seven fish weighing a total of 1,081 g were caught moving upstream, and 17 fish weighing a total of 472 g were caught moving downstream. Although more moved downstream than up, the larger average size of the fish moving upstream resulted in a large transfer of fish upstream. Diurnal oxygen series were run to measure the metabolism of the aquatic community. Gross photosynthesis at the principal sampling station ranged from 0.21 to almost 9 g O 2 m—2 day—1, and community respiration from 0.4 to 13 g O 2 m—2 day—1 (mean of 290 and 479 g O 2 m—2 yr—1). Both were highest in the spring. Area values of metabolism were often similar for different parts of the stream, but both production per volume and respiration per volume were always much larger near the headwaters than farther downstream. Migration may allow populations to take advantage of such differences in productivity by maintaining young fish in areas of high productivity. Other effects of migration may include: prey control, recolonization of defaunated regions, genetic exchange, and mineral distribution. An energy diagram was drawn comparing energies of insolation, leaf inputs, currents, total community respiration, fish populations, and migrations. About 1% of the total respiration of the stream was from fish populations, and over 1 year about 0.04% of the total energy used by the ecosystem was used for the process of migration. If it is assumed that upstream migration is necessary to maintain stocks, which may be periodically decimated by droughts, each Calorie invested by a fish population in migration returns at least 25 Calories (kilocalories). Even without that assumption returns are 3—fold. Analysis of phosphorus entering and leaving the watershed studied indicated that flows were very small relative to storages and that this generally undisturbed ecosystem is in approximate phosphorus balance. Upstream migrating fish were important in maintaining phosphorus reserves in the headwaters of New Hope Creek.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1934773

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
Hall, C. A. S.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1972-07
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
585-604
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2073454648
Cited by
278
References
0
FWCI
10.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Migration and Metabolism in a Temperate Stream Ecosystem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1934773
The paper
Hall, C. A. S. (1972). Migration and Metabolism in a Temperate Stream Ecosystem. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934773

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.