Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Egg Size, Hatching Asynchrony, Sex, and Brood Reduction in the Common Grackle

Howe, Henry F.·1976·Ecology

Abstract

In clutches of five, the Common Grackle (Quiscalus quiscula) provisions eggs unequally and starts incubation before the clutch is complete, thereby insuring initial advantages to some young which are not accrued to others. Field observations and experiments show: (1) egg wt increases with laying sequence within the clutch, (2) intraclutch variation in egg size results in competitive advantages in growth for young from large eggs, (3) asynchronous hatching favors young which hatch early at the expense of those which hatch late, (4) starvation mediates brood reduction of late—hatching young in many nests, and (5) normal brood reduction produces a sex ratio skewed in favor of ♀ ♀. Egg size variation within the clutch and asynchronous hatching are interpreted as antagonistic forms of parental investment. Presence of both adaptations suggests that the parent attempts to ensure the survival of chicks which hatch late as long as possible within an overall pattern of initial investment which ensures starvation of those individual young if food is insufficient to raise the entire brood. This retention is interpreted as a means by which the parent maximizes reproduction in the event of unexpectedly favorable food conditions. Elimination of late—hatching young produces a sex ratio favoring ♀ ♀ because ultimately investment in that sex is dependable if exceptionally healthy, and hence potentially polygynous, ♂ ♂ cannot be produced. Facultative adjustment of sex ratio within the brood may produce a high variance around a population sex ratio of 1:1 or some kurtoisis necessitated by unequal costs of raising individuals of each sex. The overall pattern of brood reduction in this species is interpreted as an evolved system by which a ♀ parent reduces risks so as to maximize inclusive fitness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1935044

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Howe, H. F.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1976-11
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
1195-1207
ISSN
0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966581057
Cited by
310
References
31
FWCI
19.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Egg Size, Hatching Asynchrony, Sex, and Brood Reduction in the Common Grackle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1935044
The paper
Howe, H. F. (1976). Egg Size, Hatching Asynchrony, Sex, and Brood Reduction in the Common Grackle. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935044

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.