The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Apparent Size as the Determinant of Prey Selection by Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis Macrochirus)
Open accessAbstract
Although it is known that visual predation by planktivorous fish tends to be size selective, the mechanism by which fish select their prey has not previously been described. Experiments in which bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) were given a binary choice between prey of different sizes presented at different distances showed the fish selected the prey that appeared largest, either because of its actual size or its proximity to the fish. This paper incorporates this mechanism to prey selection by apparent size into a model of blue gill predation. According to the model, bluegill, in choosing the apparently largest prey under all conditions, alter their diet composition depending upon the abundance of prey. When prey are abundant, bluegill predominantly select prey of the largest size class available because these have the greatest probability of appearing largest as large prey become scarce and smaller prey have a greater chance of appearing large, the fish tend to eat more prey from smaller size classes. When the model is tested against data from published fish—feeding experiments, the predicted size ratios of prey eaten correlated accurately with the observed ratios and numbers of prey eaten.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brooks, J. L., & Dodson, S. I. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3692.28 · Cited by 3,280
Cited by
Predation on eggs and larvae of marine fishes and the recruitment problem
Bailey, K. M., & Houde, E. D. (1989) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2881(08)60187-x · Cited by 1,051
Experimental Tests of Optimal Habitat Use in Fish: The Role of Relative Habitat Profitability
Werner, E. E., Mittelbach, G. G., Hall, D. J., & Gilliam, J. F. (1983) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937507 · Cited by 426
Predation, competition, and zooplankton community structure: An experimental study1,2
Lynch, M. (1979) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1979.24.2.0253 · Cited by 355
Critchell, K., & Hoogenboom, M. O. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193308 · Cited by 310
A theoretical model of aquatic visual feeding
Aksnes, D. L., & Giske, J. (1993) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/0304-3800(93)90007-f · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Brien, W. J., Slade, N. A., & Vinyard, G. L.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1976-11
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1304-1310
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052303251
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Apparent Size as the Determinant of Prey Selection by Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis Macrochirus). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1935055
- The paper
- O'Brien, W. J., Slade, N. A., & Vinyard, G. L. (1976). Apparent Size as the Determinant of Prey Selection by Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis Macrochirus). Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.