Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 458

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Zooplankton Competition and Predation: An Experimental Test of the Size‐Efficiency Hypothesis

Dodson, Stanley I.·1974·Ecology

Abstract

Twelve 42—liter plankton cages were used in an alpine Colorado pond to test a size—efficiency hypothesis: to determine why small herbivorous zooplankton species tend not to coexist with large species. The size—efficiency hypothesis, that large species exclude the smaller ones through competition for food, was not substantiated. An alternate hypothesis extends the understanding of the importance of size—selective predators to include invertebrates selecting small prey. A predaceous copepod Diaptomus shoshone excluded the small Daphnia minnehaha from an association with the large D. middendorffiana within 1 mo. By implication, the predacious copepod is responsible for the absence of the small species in ponds occupied by the large Daphnia species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1935150

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 458

Metadata

Authors
Dodson, S. I.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1974-05
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
605-613
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2046503622
Cited by
458
References
1
FWCI
12.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zooplankton Competition and Predation: An Experimental Test of the Size‐Efficiency Hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1935150
The paper
Dodson, S. I. (1974). Zooplankton Competition and Predation: An Experimental Test of the Size‐Efficiency Hypothesis. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935150

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.