The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Competition and Habitat Shift in Two Sunfishes (Centrarchidae)
Abstract
The bluegill sunfish (Lepomis marcrochirus) in small ponds feeds on relatively large prey associated with the vegetation. However, in the presence of the green sunfish (L. cyanellus) it shifts to feeding on smaller, less preferred prey in the open water column. The mechanisms responsible for this habitat shift were examined by experimentally confining both species, alone and together, in homogeneous patches of the preferred habitat (vegetation). When confirmed together in the vegetation the green sunfish exhibited higher survivorship, growth rates, and amount of food in the stomachs that the bluegill. The bluegill fed on smaller items and consumed benthic prey than did the green sunfish. The presence of the congener did not alter the food habits of either species or the growth rates of the green sunfish in relation to species stocked alone. Presence of the congener did affect the growth rates of the bluegill. Overlap in the diet was 70% when these species were confined to the vegetation as compared to 44% in an earlier study where habitat separation was permitted. The green sunfish is more of a sit—and—wait predator and is able to utilize a wider food size spectrum than the bluegill. This results in a strong asymmetry in the competition function favoring the green sunfish in the vegetation. However, in the open water column the distribution of food sizes is truncated and this provides a competitive refuge for the bluegill which handles small foods more efficiently. The bluegill appears to be more flexible in its habitat use while the green sunfish is more aggressive and limited in the habitats utilized. Comparisons with studies of habitat shifts in salmonids suggest that the competitive mechanisms outlined are of general relevance in fish communities. Considerations of the relation between habitat structure, the correlated distribution of food sizes, and species morphology provides a framework for specifying the occurence of habitat shifts and which species of the interactive set will shift.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment
MacArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282454 · Cited by 4,593
Cited by
Foraging Efficiency and Body Size: A Study of Optimal Diet and Habitat Use by Bluegills
Mittelbach, G. G. (1981) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937300 · Cited by 915
Experimental Tests of Optimal Habitat Use in Fish: The Role of Relative Habitat Profitability
Werner, E. E., Mittelbach, G. G., Hall, D. J., & Gilliam, J. F. (1983) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937507 · Cited by 426
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Werner, E. E., & Hall, D. J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-07
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 869-876
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2146940580
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition and Habitat Shift in Two Sunfishes (Centrarchidae). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936222
- The paper
- Werner, E. E., & Hall, D. J. (1977). Competition and Habitat Shift in Two Sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936222
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.