The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Foraging Efficiency and Body Size: A Study of Optimal Diet and Habitat Use by Bluegills
Abstract
A foraging model was developed to predict the optimal diet breadth and maximum energetic intake of a given—sized fish foraging in each of three aquatic habitats: the open water, vegetation, and bare sediments. Model parameters of prey encounter rates and prey handling times were quantified as functions of fish size, prey density, and prey size through a series of laboratory feeding experiments using the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Results of these experiments show both searching ability and prey handling efficiency to increase with increasing fish size. Predictions of prey size selection and optimal habitat use based upon maximizing energetic gain were then examined in a small Michigan lake for three size classes of bluegills. Bluegills > 100 mm standard length were highly size selective in their feeding and their diets closely matched predictions of an optimal diet model. From two estimates of relative prey visibilities I show that these fish selected larger prey items than would be predicted if prey were consumed “as encountered.” Habitat use of large bluegills was also shown to maximize foraging return as fish switched from utilizing vegetation—living prey to utilizing open—water zooplankton as relative foraging profitabilities in the two habitats changed across the summer. Bluegills <100 mm standard length were restricted in their habitat use, remaining in or near the vegetation despite demonstrated increases in foraging return available in the open—water habitat. Size—related predation risk apparently accounts for differences in habitat use between bluegill size classes, and its consequences for intra— and interspecific competition between size classes are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal Foraging: A Selective Review of Theory and Tests
Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R., & Charnov, E. L. (1977) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409852 · Cited by 3,373
Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes
Farris, D. A., Ivlev, V. S., & Scott, D. (1962) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1439522 · Cited by 1,751
Dumont, H. J., Van de Velde, I., & Dumont, S. (1975) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00377592 · Cited by 1,266
Optimal Foraging and the Size Selection of Prey by the Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis Macrochirus)
Werner, E. E., & Hall, D. J. (1974) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940354 · Cited by 1,188
Optimal Behavior: Can Foragers Balance Two Conflicting Demands?
Sih, A. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.210.4473.1041 · Cited by 911
Optimal Foraging: Attack Strategy of a Mantid
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283054 · Cited by 802
Energy equivalents of oxygen consumption in animal energetics
Elliott, J. M., & Davison, W. (1975) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00345305 · Cited by 744
Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: The moose
Belovsky, G. E. (1978) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(78)90007-2 · Cited by 639
AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO THE PRODUCTION DYNAMICS AND STRUCTURE OF FRESHWATER ANIMAL COMMUNITIES1
Hall, D. J., Cooper, W. E., & Werner, E. E. (1970) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1970.15.6.0839 · Cited by 637
Optimal prey selection in the great tit (Parus major)
Krebs, J. R., Erichsen, J. T., Webber, M. I., & Charnov, E. L. (1977) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(77)90064-1 · Cited by 559
Cited by
Dilute Concentrations of a Psychiatric Drug Alter Behavior of Fish from Natural Populations
Brodin, T., Fick, J., Jonsson, M., & Klaminder, J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1226850 · Cited by 850
Stream Fish Ecology: A Landscape Perspective
Schlosser, I. J. (1991) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1311765 · Cited by 844
Experimental Tests of Optimal Habitat Use in Fish: The Role of Relative Habitat Profitability
Werner, E. E., Mittelbach, G. G., Hall, D. J., & Gilliam, J. F. (1983) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937507 · Cited by 426
Self-citationTurner, A. M., & Mittelbach, G. G. (1990) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938636 · Cited by 352
Self-citationSize, Scaling, and the Evolution of Complex Life Cycles
Werner, E. E. (1988) · Size-Structured Populations · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-74001-5_6 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Mittelbach, G. G.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-10
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1370-1386
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2023915165
- Cited by
- 915
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 30.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foraging Efficiency and Body Size: A Study of Optimal Diet and Habitat Use by Bluegills. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937300
- The paper
- Mittelbach, G. G. (1981). Foraging Efficiency and Body Size: A Study of Optimal Diet and Habitat Use by Bluegills. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937300
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.