Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 915

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Foraging Efficiency and Body Size: A Study of Optimal Diet and Habitat Use by Bluegills

Mittelbach, Gary G.·1981·Ecology

Abstract

A foraging model was developed to predict the optimal diet breadth and maximum energetic intake of a given—sized fish foraging in each of three aquatic habitats: the open water, vegetation, and bare sediments. Model parameters of prey encounter rates and prey handling times were quantified as functions of fish size, prey density, and prey size through a series of laboratory feeding experiments using the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Results of these experiments show both searching ability and prey handling efficiency to increase with increasing fish size. Predictions of prey size selection and optimal habitat use based upon maximizing energetic gain were then examined in a small Michigan lake for three size classes of bluegills. Bluegills > 100 mm standard length were highly size selective in their feeding and their diets closely matched predictions of an optimal diet model. From two estimates of relative prey visibilities I show that these fish selected larger prey items than would be predicted if prey were consumed “as encountered.” Habitat use of large bluegills was also shown to maximize foraging return as fish switched from utilizing vegetation—living prey to utilizing open—water zooplankton as relative foraging profitabilities in the two habitats changed across the summer. Bluegills <100 mm standard length were restricted in their habitat use, remaining in or near the vegetation despite demonstrated increases in foraging return available in the open—water habitat. Size—related predation risk apparently accounts for differences in habitat use between bluegill size classes, and its consequences for intra— and interspecific competition between size classes are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1937300

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 915

Metadata

Authors
Mittelbach, G. G.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1981-10
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
1370-1386
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2023915165
Cited by
915
References
31
FWCI
30.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foraging Efficiency and Body Size: A Study of Optimal Diet and Habitat Use by Bluegills. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937300
The paper
Mittelbach, G. G. (1981). Foraging Efficiency and Body Size: A Study of Optimal Diet and Habitat Use by Bluegills. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937300

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.