Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fecundity and Seed Dispersal of a Tropical Tree

Howe, Henry F., Vande Kerckhove, Gayle A.·1979·Ecology

Abstract

We observed feeding assemblages of birds at a Costa Rican dry—forest population of Casearia corymbosa (Flacourtiaceae) in order to distinguish effective dispersers from a incidental visitors and to examine the relationship between fruit production and depletion by birds at individual plants. On the basis of 1956 recorded visits by birds, the Yellow—green Vireo (Vireo flavoviridis) was the most reliable disperser throughout the season, accounting for 65% of the arillate seeds removed. Other common visitors were the Streaked Flycatcher (Myiodynastes maculatus) 12%, Golden—fronted Woodpecker (Melanerpes aurifrons) 9%, Pale—throated Flycatcher (Myiarchus nuttingi) 8%. All stripped off the oily arils in the crop and regurgitated viable seeds from perches in surrounding forest. Sporadic visitation by 10 other trogons and passerines accounted for the remainder of fruit utilized by birds. Capsules opened early in the morning, and fruit accessible to birds was depleted by early afternoon. At 17 closely monitored plants, birds removed 91% of the accessible arillate seeds. Crop sizes ranged from 1—2700, with dispersal success highest among plants of intermediate fecundity. Variance was attributable to individuals with low fecundity, often missed by birds on all but the most productive days, and to an exceptionally fecund tree that satiated its visitors. The dispersal ecology of the small dry—forest tree offers a unique comparison to that of a more fecund overstory ecotype in wet forest. In secondary dry forest, a protocooperative relationship exists between several bird species and this plant, with an abundant and efficient vireo responsible for most dispersal.In the wet forest, dispersal occurs through a mutualistic relationship with a cotinga (Tityra semifasciata), while most common visitors are "fruit thieves" of little benefit to the plant. These differences are considered in light of comparative ecology of the 2 forms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1936479

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Howe, H. F., & Vande Kerckhove, G. A.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1979-02
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
180-189
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2104482733
Cited by
164
References
1
FWCI
21.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fecundity and Seed Dispersal of a Tropical Tree. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936479
The paper
Howe, H. F., & Vande Kerckhove, G. A. (1979). Fecundity and Seed Dispersal of a Tropical Tree. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936479

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.