Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study: Forest Nutrient Cycling and Element Behavior

Whittaker, R. H., Likens, G. E., Bormann, F. H., Easton, J. S., Siccama, T. G.·1979·Ecology

Abstract

Data from dimension analysis of forest biomass and production are combined with analyses of plant tissues, soil, and precipitation to describe nutrient cycling in a cool—temperate deciduous forest on a podzol. Mean concentrations of nutrient elements measured (N, P, S, Ca, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Fe, Zn, Cu) in tissues are relatively low, and nutrient stocks in vegetation are low compared with other forests because of the low concentrations and the relative youth of the forest (cut in 1909—17). The largest fractions of nutrients in aboveground net primary production (NPP) go into leaves–58—78% of all nutrients except Na (45%)–although leaves are only 40% of aboveground NPP. Net community (woody) growth included °30% of aboveground NPP, but smaller fractions of nutrients (7% of N and K to 21% of Ca and 28% of Na). Nitrogen, P, and some other elements are retracted from dying leaves; but concentrations of Ca, Mn, and Na increase from living to dead leaves, branches, and stem wood. Return to the soil from aboveground is primarily by leaching for K and Na but by litterfall for other elements. "Throughflow" is defined as nutrient uptake needed beyond that in NPP to provide for both leaching and increase in dead tissues before they fall. For Na, throughflow exceeds uptake into NPP; but negative throughflows for N and P reflect conservation of these elements. Belowground plant nutrient stocks are 0.25 to 0.5x and belowground uptake rates into NPP are 0.1 to 0.2x aboveground values for most elements, but belowground values are higher for N, P, Na, and Fe. Significant amounts of some elements, especially S, Ca, K, and Na, are exuded from roots as part of the total, above— and belowground throughflow. Behaviors of nutrient elements can be characterized by ratios expressing concentration into leaves vs. woody tissues and relative leachability and throughflow vs. conservation. Relative turnover rates compare litterfall plus leaching with aboveground stocks or with nutrient contents of NPP. Turnover rates increase in the sequence: N and P; Ca; Mg, K, Fe, and Mn; S; and Na. Means and coefficients of variation of foliage nutrient concentrations express some differences between ecosystems. Comparing different ecosystems, coefficients of variation are low for N and P, intermediate for Ca, K, Mg, and Al, and high for Si, Mn, Fe, Cl, and Na. Differences in these and other expressions of element behavior can be interpreted on the basis of function in plants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1936481

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Whittaker, R. H., Likens, G. E., Bormann, F. H., Easton, J. S., & Siccama, T. G.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1979-02
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
203-220
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2022058315
Cited by
270
References
23
FWCI
16.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study: Forest Nutrient Cycling and Element Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936481
The paper
Whittaker, R. H., Likens, G. E., Bormann, F. H., Easton, J. S., & Siccama, T. G. (1979). The Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study: Forest Nutrient Cycling and Element Behavior. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936481

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.