Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nutrient Retention by the Root Mat of an Amazonian Rain Forest

Stark, Nellie M., Jordan, Carl F.·1978·Ecology

Abstract

Surface root mats on oxisols and spodosols near San Carlos de Rio Negro, Venezuela, were sprayed with (45)Ca and (32)P to simulate the addition of nutrients to the soil surface through leaching of decomposing litter, and through precipitation and throughfall. Collections from lysimeters placed below the root mat and humus layer showed that in all but 1 case, <0.1% of the radiotracers leached past the root–organic mat, and leaching stopped completely after 1 to 2 months. Through analysis of root mat samples, the radioisotopes were found to have been taken up and translocated by living roots. This is the first evidence supporting the ability of the root map on the surface of poor, depleted tropical soils to efficiently take up dissolved nutrients before they percolate down to mineral soil. Other studies have shown up that one of the uptake mechanisms is mycorrhizal fungi.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1936571

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Stark, N. M., & Jordan, C. F.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-05
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
434-437
ISSN
0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050615476
Cited by
299
References
0
FWCI
10.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient Retention by the Root Mat of an Amazonian Rain Forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936571
The paper
Stark, N. M., & Jordan, C. F. (1978). Nutrient Retention by the Root Mat of an Amazonian Rain Forest. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936571

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.