Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Monkey Dispersal and Waste of a Neotropical Fruit

Howe, Henry F.·1980·Ecology

Abstract

Foraging birds and mammals were observed at a Panamanian rain forest tree Tetragastris panamensis (Burseraceae) in order to determine (1) relative importance of different dispersal agents and (2) the relationship between fruit production and dispersal. The system is of interest because fruits provide little but sugar, fruits are not depleted by animals (i.e., are superabundant), and the tree is visited by a variety of vertebrates with different effects on seed dissemination. Three mammals (Alouatta palliata, Cebus capucinus, Nasua narica) account for 97% of all seeds removed from the trees; the howler monkey (Alouatta) is alone responsible for 74% of the seeds removed. Seeds from the feces of these mammals are fully viable. In addition, two diurnal mammals, three nocturnal mammals, and nine birds ingest and disperse small numbers of seeds, but these species are numerically insignificant. Two parrots (Amazona farinosa and A. autumnalis) are important fruit thieves and seed predators, while three mammals and three additional birds kill or drop small numbers of seeds near the parent trees. Assemblage richness increases markedly with crop size, but most of 25 visitors are of little significance to the plant. Use by three monkeys closely reflects their relative abundance; the abundance of the coatimundi (Nasua) is unknown. This system is characterized by enormous seed waste. Of >430,000 seeds produced by 19 study trees in 1978, <4% had even a remote chance of establishment. The remainder were killed by parrots (6%), were dropped or spontaneously fell under parent trees (66%), or were doomed to intense competition in fecal clumps (24%). The three primary dispersal agents indirectly caused most seed and seedling mortality of dropping seeds under the tree crown or leaving them in fecal clumps, precluding survival of any but a small fraction of seedlings. Crop size ranged from 165 to 100,000 arillate seeds per season, but fruits appeared superabundant on all trees. Numbers of seeds dispersed increases dramatically with crop size, but the proportion dispersed was highest at plants with crops of intermediate size. The proportion of seeds killed by parrots increased with crop size. Disproportionate mortality of seedlings in high densities near adult trees indicated density—dependent mortality among juveniles. Wide geographical ranges of this tree and members of the frugivore assemblage, use of other food resources by common foragers, richness of the assemblage, variation in species visitation at individual trees, irregular annual fruits production, and obvious "inefficiecy" of the dominant dispersal agents from the perspective of the plant suggest that Tetragastris has a generalized dispersal strategy and is not closely coevolved with particular frugivores. A generalized dispersal system is expected from a tree, such as this one, that produces sugary fruit incapable of providing a balanced diet.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1936763

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 251

Metadata

Authors
Howe, H. F.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1980-08
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
944-959
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2019920611
Cited by
251
References
4
FWCI
21.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monkey Dispersal and Waste of a Neotropical Fruit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936763
The paper
Howe, H. F. (1980). Monkey Dispersal and Waste of a Neotropical Fruit. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936763

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.