The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sympatry of Desert Lizards (Ctenotus) in Western Australia
Abstract
Seven species of congeneric lizards (Ctenotus) frequently occur in ecologic sympatry in the Australian desert. The ecologies of these and seven other species are described and compared, with particular reference to niche differences. Adult Ctenotus range from 45 to 118 mm in snout—vent length. Larger species take larger prey items than smaller ones. Six species do most of their foraging in the open spaces between plants, while six others forage mostly within the dense tussocks of porcupine grass (Triodea). The former have proportionately longer hindlegs than the latter. It is demonstrated that hindleg and head proportions are good morphological indicators of the place niche and the food niche, respectively, and that body temperature reflects the time niche in a useful way. Lizards with higher body temperatures are usually active later in the day than those with lower body temperatures. Whereas the species which forage in the open show a poor correlation between air temperature and body temperature, those that forage in shady places within vegetation have body temperatures closely correlated with ambient air temperatures. The former are dependent upon direct solar and/or substrate heat, while the latter appear not to substantially exploit these heat sources. After analyzing the ways in which the lizards subdivide habitat space and environmental resources, it is concluded that there are at least three dimensions to the Ctenotus niche: place, food, and time. An analysis is presented which demonstrates that Ctenotus are ecologically rather tightly "packed," and it is suggested that the overall differences between pairs may represent minimal ecologic distances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 48,949
The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species
Macarthur, R., & Levins, R. (1967) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282505 · Cited by 4,611
Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2)
LEVINS, R. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvx5wbbh · Cited by 3,383
Measurement of "Overlap" in Comparative Ecological Studies
Horn, H. S. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282436 · Cited by 1,613
Brattstrom, B. H. (1965) · American Midland Naturalist · doi:10.2307/2423461 · Cited by 590
On the Methods of Resource Division in Grassland Bird Communities
Cody, M. L. (1968) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282531 · Cited by 354
On Lizard Species Diversity: North American Flatland Deserts
Pianka, E. R. (1967) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1932670 · Cited by 326
Self-citationObservations on the Thermal Relations of Western Australian Lizards
Light, P., Dawson, W. R., Shoemaker, V. H., & Main, A. R. (1966) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1440766 · Cited by 250
Cited by
Schoener, T. W. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4145.27 · Cited by 4,129
Partitioning of time as an ecological resource
Kronfeld-Schor, N., & Dayan, T. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132435 · Cited by 1,021
Metadata
- Authors
- Pianka, E. R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1969-11
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1012-1030
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2318439406
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 13.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sympatry of Desert Lizards (Ctenotus) in Western Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936893
- The paper
- Pianka, E. R. (1969). Sympatry of Desert Lizards (Ctenotus) in Western Australia. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936893
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.