Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sympatry of Desert Lizards (Ctenotus) in Western Australia

Pianka, Eric R.·1969·Ecology

Abstract

Seven species of congeneric lizards (Ctenotus) frequently occur in ecologic sympatry in the Australian desert. The ecologies of these and seven other species are described and compared, with particular reference to niche differences. Adult Ctenotus range from 45 to 118 mm in snout—vent length. Larger species take larger prey items than smaller ones. Six species do most of their foraging in the open spaces between plants, while six others forage mostly within the dense tussocks of porcupine grass (Triodea). The former have proportionately longer hindlegs than the latter. It is demonstrated that hindleg and head proportions are good morphological indicators of the place niche and the food niche, respectively, and that body temperature reflects the time niche in a useful way. Lizards with higher body temperatures are usually active later in the day than those with lower body temperatures. Whereas the species which forage in the open show a poor correlation between air temperature and body temperature, those that forage in shady places within vegetation have body temperatures closely correlated with ambient air temperatures. The former are dependent upon direct solar and/or substrate heat, while the latter appear not to substantially exploit these heat sources. After analyzing the ways in which the lizards subdivide habitat space and environmental resources, it is concluded that there are at least three dimensions to the Ctenotus niche: place, food, and time. An analysis is presented which demonstrates that Ctenotus are ecologically rather tightly "packed," and it is suggested that the overall differences between pairs may represent minimal ecologic distances.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1936893

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Metadata

Authors
Pianka, E. R.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1969-11
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
1012-1030
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2318439406
Cited by
363
References
8
FWCI
13.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sympatry of Desert Lizards (Ctenotus) in Western Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936893
The paper
Pianka, E. R. (1969). Sympatry of Desert Lizards (Ctenotus) in Western Australia. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936893

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.