Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 730

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Seasonal Changes in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fractions and Autumn Retranslocation in Evergreen and Deciduous Taiga Trees

Chapin, F. Stuart, Kedrowski, Richard A.·1983·Ecology

Abstract

The concentrations and pool sizes of nitrogen— and phosphorus—containing chemical fractions were followed seasonally in leaves and young stems of four Alaskan tree species: larch (Larix laricina), black spruce (Picea mariana), birch (Betula papyrifera), and alder (Alnus crispa). We found no major differences in patterns of N and P distributions among major chemical fractions in nutritionally distinct deciduous trees. In the three diciduous species, all N and P fractions were highest in young leaves and declined in concentration through the season, first as concentration was diluted by increasing leaf biomass and later as organic N and P fractions were hydrolyzed and inorganic P and amino acid N were translocated out of leaves. The quantities of nucleic acids and phospholipids hydrolyzed in autumn were equivalent to 40—47% and 26—38%, respectively, of the total P retranslocated from leaves of deciduous species prior to abscission. Protein hydrolyzed and subsequently retranslocated as amino acids was equivalent to 82—91% of the N removed from senescing leaves. Leaching was much less important than retranslocation in removing nutrients from senescing leaves. In buds and stems, P was stored during winter primarily as phospholipid, nonhydrolyzable ester P, and nucleic acid P and was converted to inorganic P in spring. All species stored N primarily as protein and to lesser extent as nucleic acids; larch also stored some N in amino acids. In the evergreen spruce, N and P were stored in the same types of compounds as in deciduous species, but this nutrient storage occurred in leaves and involved no winter translocation to stems. Based on this study and a survey of the literature, we suggest that trees with low N and P status retranslocate a similar or smaller proportion of leaf N and P prior to leaf abscission than do trees with more favorable nutrients status. We conclude that tree have not adapted to nutrient stress through major changes in biochemical use of N and P. However, during the growing season there are important changes in allocation of N and P to different chemical fractions, associated with changing plant requirements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1937083

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 730

Metadata

Authors
Chapin, F. S., & Kedrowski, R. A.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-04
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
376-391
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2059679174
Cited by
730
References
2
FWCI
13.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seasonal Changes in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fractions and Autumn Retranslocation in Evergreen and Deciduous Taiga Trees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937083
The paper
Chapin, F. S., & Kedrowski, R. A. (1983). Seasonal Changes in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fractions and Autumn Retranslocation in Evergreen and Deciduous Taiga Trees. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937083

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.