The DOI matches its Crossref record.
AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO THE PRODUCTION DYNAMICS AND STRUCTURE OF FRESHWATER ANIMAL COMMUNITIES1
Abstract
The effects of three levels of inorganic nutrients and two predator densities on aquatic animal communities were examined in a series of twenty 0.07‐ha freshwater ponds. The treatments were cross‐classified in a randomized block design and continued over 3 years. Analyses of the responses include community composition, secondary production, and demographic description of the dominant species of both zooplankton and benthos. The fish populations and their feeding behavior are described in detail. Ancillary data on water chemistry and primary production were available. Nutrients generally increased production of the zooplankton but had little effect on community composition. Fish predation had profound effects on the diversity and size distribution of the zooplankton but only affected production at lower nutrient levels. The benthos responded markedly to nutrients during the first year, but this was not apparent the second and third years. The response of the benthos to both nutrients and predation was best shown by changes in the distribution of body size. Both zooplankton and benthic communities showed complementary responses between large‐ and small‐bodied organisms. Differences in the physical structure of the environment (i.e., macrophytes) also produced significant changes in production and composition of both systems. The biomass production of the fish populations was clearly related to nutrient level. Both fish and invertebrate predators were size selective, but the fish had a much greater influence on the prey populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Foraging Efficiency and Body Size: A Study of Optimal Diet and Habitat Use by Bluegills
Mittelbach, G. G. (1981) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937300 · Cited by 915
Experimental Tests of Optimal Habitat Use in Fish: The Role of Relative Habitat Profitability
Werner, E. E., Mittelbach, G. G., Hall, D. J., & Gilliam, J. F. (1983) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937507 · Cited by 426
Self-citationFood Chain Dynamics: The Central Theory of Ecology?
Fretwell, S. D. (1987) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3565489 · Cited by 402
RESISTANCE AND RESILIENCE OF ALPINE LAKE FAUNA TO FISH INTRODUCTIONS
Knapp, R. A., Matthews, K. R., & Sarnelle, O. (2001) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0401:raroal]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 367
Determination of Species Composition in the Enallagma Damselfly Assemblages of Permanent Lakes
McPeek, M. A. (1990) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940249 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, D. J., Cooper, W. E., & Werner, E. E.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1970-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 839-928
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W1978955541
- Cited by
- 637
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO THE PRODUCTION DYNAMICS AND STRUCTURE OF FRESHWATER ANIMAL COMMUNITIES1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1970.15.6.0839
- The paper
- Hall, D. J., Cooper, W. E., & Werner, E. E. (1970). AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO THE PRODUCTION DYNAMICS AND STRUCTURE OF FRESHWATER ANIMAL COMMUNITIES1. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1970.15.6.0839
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.