Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Ecology of Tick Parasitism on Densely Nesting Peruvian Seabirds

Duffy, David Cameron·1983·Ecology

Abstract

Densely nesting Guanay Cormorants (Phalacrocorax bougainvillii), Peruvian Booby (Sula variegata), and Peruvian Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis thagus) deserted eggs and young in response to high densities of argasid ticks (Ornithodoros amblus). Alternative causes of desertion such as human disturbance, predation, disease, heat, and food shortage did not fit the evidence. Tick predators were less effective at controlling ticks than were frequent human harvestings of guano. A review of the avian and medical entomological literature indicates that ticks and other ectoparasites may be strong determinants of nesting success and of nest structure and duration of use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1937334

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Duffy, D. C.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-02
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
110-119
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2016931890
Cited by
219
References
0
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ecology of Tick Parasitism on Densely Nesting Peruvian Seabirds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937334
The paper
Duffy, D. C. (1983). The Ecology of Tick Parasitism on Densely Nesting Peruvian Seabirds. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937334

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.