The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Habitat Choice and Phenotype‐Limited Feeding Efficiency in Bluegill: Individual Differences and Trophic Polymorphism
Abstract
Individual variation in the foraging behavior of bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) was studied in laboratory aquaria containing vegetated and open water habitats. In general fish chose to search for prey in the habitat that provided the highest foraging return, but individuals differed markedly in the degree of habitat selection. Vegetation and open water habitats require different searching techniques for efficient prey detection and individual bluegill differed in their levels of behavioral adjustment to each habitat. Fish using slower searching tactics had the highest foraging rates in the vegetation, whereas individuals searching rapidly fed more effectively in the open water. These behavioral differences in searching rates were found to be correlated with the size of the pectoral fins. Bluegill with longer pectoral fins consistently searched more slowly and spent more time in the vegetation habitat compared to bluegill with shorter pectoral fins. These results indicate that behavioral and morphological variation among individuals can influence habitat—specific feeding efficiency and habitat selection, and may also have direct consequences for models of density— and frequency—dependent habitat selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
Cited by
The Ecology of Individuals: Incidence and Implications of Individual Specialization
Bolnick, D. I., Svanbäck, R., Fordyce, J. A., Yang, L. H., Davis, J. M., Hulsey, C. D., & Forister, M. L. (2003) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/343878 · Cited by 2,762
EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE OF RESOURCE POLYMORPHISMS IN FISHES, AMPHIBIANS, AND BIRDS
Smith, T. B., & Skúlason, S. (1996) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.111 · Cited by 720
Individual variation in prey selection by sea otters: patterns, causes and implications
Estes, J. A., Riedman, M. L., Staedler, M. M., Tinker, M. T., & Lyon, B. E. (2003) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00690.x · Cited by 486
Adaptive Radiation in Sticklebacks: Trade‐Offs in Feeding Performance and Growth
Schluter, D. (1995) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940633 · Cited by 414
Predicting patterns of prey use from morphology of fishes
Wainwright, P. C., & Richard, B. A. (1995) · Developments in environmental biology of fishes · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1356-6_7 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Ehlinger, T. J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 886-896
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1991039676
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Habitat Choice and Phenotype‐Limited Feeding Efficiency in Bluegill: Individual Differences and Trophic Polymorphism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937360
- The paper
- Ehlinger, T. J. (1990). Habitat Choice and Phenotype‐Limited Feeding Efficiency in Bluegill: Individual Differences and Trophic Polymorphism. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.