Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 509

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Plant Species Migration in a Mixed‐History Forest Landscape in Eastern North America

Matlack, Glenn R.·1994·Ecology

Abstract

The understory flora of successional forest in the Delaware/Pennsylvania Piedmont zone (USA) is species poor relative to old regrowth stands in the region. Impoverishment may reflect (a) limitations on dispersal of potential colonists, or (b) the unsuitability of successional stands for establishment. To examine the importance of dispersal, herb and shrub distributions were surveyed in successional stands of varying age and spatial arrangement. In successional stands contiguous with species—rich old—regrowth forest, understory species richness declined with distance into the successional stands, implying contagion across the old—regrowth ecotone. Individual species showed evidence of contagion in 67% of site x species combinations. Mean rates of migration ranged from to measurable movement (e.g., Carex laxiflora, Cimicifuga racemosa) to >2 m/yr in some species (e.g., Galium aparine, Potentilla canadensis). Significant differences in rate of migration were observed among seed dispersal modes: ingested > adhesive ° wind @> ants @> none. By contrast, there were no significant differences in rate between clonal and exclusively sexual species. In stands disjunct from old regrowth, the understory was species poor relative to old—regrowth forest due to a lack of species dispersed by ants and spores and those with no obvious dispersal vector. Understory species richness was greater in older disjunct stands and in stands closer to potential sources of propagules than in young and isolated stands, trends that were also noted in distributions of individual species. These results suggest that accessibility to colonists plays an important role in determining understory composition of successional stands. Medium— and long—range migration appears to be an issue of seed and spore dispersal rather than vegetative propagation. The extremely low migration rates of some species threaten their continued existence in the second—growth forest landscape.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1937472

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Matlack, G. R.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-07
Volume
75
Issue
5
Pages
1491-1502
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2045411870
Cited by
509
References
0
FWCI
10.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant Species Migration in a Mixed‐History Forest Landscape in Eastern North America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937472
The paper
Matlack, G. R. (1994). Plant Species Migration in a Mixed‐History Forest Landscape in Eastern North America. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937472

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.