The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Food Availability and Predation on Prairie Vole Demography: A Field Experiment
Abstract
Nutrition, spacing behavior, and predation have been proposed as major factors limiting the population density of microtine rodents (lemmings and voles). However, there is no general agreement as to the relative importance of these factors, nor have their interactions been carefully examined. This paper reports on a factorial experiment designed to test the general hypothesis that predation and the availability of high—quality food act simultaneously and additively to limit densities of microtine rodent populations. Our results showed that supplemental high—quality food significantly increased body growth rates, proportion of adults in the population, adult male body size, reproductive activity, recruitment, and density of prairie vole populations. Food availability had no effect on survival nor on sex ratio in any of the 3 yr of this study. Protection from predation significantly increased adult survival (somewhat sporadically), recruitment, and density, but it did not directly affect growth, population structure, or reproduction. Improved survival of young animals could not be detected, but increased recruitment suggested that it may have occurred, perhaps before the young reached trappable size. Food supplementation and protection from predation generally had additive and equal effects on density. The only significant food—predator interactions were for body growth rates and adult body size. The presence of predators appeared to inhibit the growth response to supplemental food, possibly because of more restricted movement and, therefore, less access to food.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Impact of Food and Predation on the Snowshoe Hare Cycle
Krebs, C. J., Boutin, S., Boonstra, R., Sinclair, A. R. E., Smith, J. N. M., Dale, M. R. T., Martin, K., & Turkington, R. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.269.5227.1112 · Cited by 699
A Neuroscientist’s Guide to the Vole
Kenkel, W. M., Gustison, M. L., & Beery, A. K. (2021) · Current Protocols · doi:10.1002/cpz1.175 · Cited by 52
Haken, A. E., & Batzli, G. O. (1996) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1382803 · Cited by 38
Self-citationSolomon, N. G., & Crist, T. O. (2008) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.028 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Desy, E. A., & Batzli, G. O.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-04
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 411-421
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2119669613
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Food Availability and Predation on Prairie Vole Demography: A Field Experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937546
- The paper
- Desy, E. A., & Batzli, G. O. (1989). Effects of Food Availability and Predation on Prairie Vole Demography: A Field Experiment. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937546
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.