Cited by 52Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionPrimate Behavior and Ecology

A Neuroscientist’s Guide to the Vole

Open access
Kenkel, William M., Gustison, Morgan L., Beery, Annaliese K.·2021·Current Protocols

Abstract

Prairie voles have emerged as an important rodent model for understanding the neuroscience of social behavior. Prairie voles are well known for their capacity for pair bonding and alloparental care. These behavioral phenomena overlap with human social behavior but are not commonly observed in traditional rodent models. In this article, we highlight the many benefits of using prairie voles in neuroscience research. We begin by describing the advantages of using diverse and non-traditional study models. We then focus on social behaviors, including pair bonding, alloparental care, and peer interactions, that have brought voles to the forefront of social neuroscience. We describe many additional features of prairie vole biology and behavior that provide researchers with opportunities to address an array of research questions. We also survey neuroethological methods that have been used with prairie voles, from classic to modern techniques. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of other vole species, particularly meadow voles, and their own unique advantages for neuroscience studies. This article provides a foundation for researchers who are new to working with voles, as well as for experienced neuroscientists who want to expand their research scope. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpz1.175

Cites

259 of 259 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prairie voles form enduring pair bonds with an opposite-sex partner and exhibit biparental care for their offspring.

    “In the past few decades, prairie voles have emerged as a model species for understanding monogamous mating strategies and complex social relationships as they form enduring pair bonds with an opposite-sex partner and exhibit biparental care for their offspring [4,9,62].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Blake BH 2002. Ultrasonic calling in isolated infant prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and montane voles (M. montanus). Journal of Mammalogy 83: 536– 545.
  2. Bosch OJ, Nair HP, Ahern TH, Neumann ID, and Young LJ 2009. The CRF system mediates increased passive stress-coping behavior following the loss of a bonded partner in a monogamous rodent. Neuropsychopharmacology 34: 1406– 15. 18923404 PMC2669698
  3. Grippo AJ, Wu KD, Hassan I, and Carter CS 2008b. Social isolation in prairie voles induces behaviors relevant to negative affect: toward the development of a rodent model focused on co-occurring depression and anxiety. Depression and Anxiety 25: 17– 26. PMC2563041 17935206
  4. Hammock EAD, and Young LJ 2005b. Microsatellite Instability Generates Diversity in Brain and Sociobehavioral Traits. Science 308: 1630– 1634. 15947188
  5. Pitkow LJ, Sharer CA, Ren X, Insel TR, Terwilliger EF, and Young LJ 2001b. Facilitation of affiliation and pair-bond formation by vasopressin receptor gene transfer into the ventral forebrain of a monogamous vole. Journal of Neuroscience 21: 7392– 7396. 11549749 PMC6762997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kenkel, W. M., Gustison, M. L., & Beery, A. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Beery, Annaliese K.
Venue
Current Protocols
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-06
Volume
1
Issue
6
Pages
e175-e175
ISSN
2691-1299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3175035194
Cited by
52
References
259
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Smith ScholarWorks (Smith College) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P20GM103653)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH115267, R15MH113085)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
Microtus ochrogaster, Microtus pennsylvanicus, pair bonding, alloparental care, peer interaction, neuroethology, social neuroscience
MeSH terms
Animals, Arvicolinae, Peer Group, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review