The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk of Predation and the Structure of Desert Rodent Communities
Abstract
Communities of granivorous desert rodents may be influenced by either predation risk or resources. To examine the influence of these factors, I manipulated illumination, using lanterns, and resources, using seeds. Foraging behavior is responsive to changes in predation risk; increased illumination reduces foraging in open areas without cover. Foraging behavior is also affected by resource enrichments. Differences among species in habitat selection are correlated with specific abilities to detect and avoid predators. The last vulnerable species, Dipodomys deserti, foraged heavily in the open and was largely unaffected by treatments; the other species of kangaroo rats and kangaroo mice (Dipodmys merriami, Dipodomys microps, and Microdipodops pallidus) also prefer the open, but responded to both risk and resource manipulations; highly vulnerable Peromyscus maniculatus was restricted to bushes, even under the best of circumstances; Perognathus longimembris was displaced from preferred microhabitat by the presence of kangaroo rats. A correlation between auditory bullar volume and use of open habitat by the various species in this community suggests that predation risk provides an axis along which habitat segregation occurs. Predation can structure communities of mobile prey when risk differs among habitats. Animals specializing in predator avoidance and in exploitation of risky environments have reduced interactions with superior competitors; this promotes coexistence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
Cited by
The dark side of light at night: physiological, epidemiological, and ecological consequences
Navara, K. J., & Nelson, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Pineal Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-079x.2007.00473.x · Cited by 795
Peckarsky, B. L., Abrams, P. A., Bolnick, D. I., Dill, L. M., Grabowski, J. H., Luttbeg, B., Orrock, J. L., Peacor, S. D., Preisser, E. L., Schmitz, O. J., et al. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1131.1 · Cited by 527
“A competing hypothesis is that predation risk promotes the distinct habitat partitioning observed in desert rodents (Kotler 1984, Brown and Kotler 2004).”
BackgroundResultPopulation Consequences of Predation‐Sensitive Foraging: The Serengeti Wildebeest
Sinclair, A. R. E., & Arcese, P. (1995) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939353 · Cited by 363
Lima, S. L. (1985) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00378552 · Cited by 317
Effects of body size and lifestyle on evolution of mammal life histories
Sibly, R. M., & Brown, J. H. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707725104 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Kotler, B. P.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-06
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 689-701
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2133245701
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of Predation and the Structure of Desert Rodent Communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938041
- The paper
- Kotler, B. P. (1984). Risk of Predation and the Structure of Desert Rodent Communities. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.