Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 416

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effects of Canopy Shadings on Algal Recruitment and Growth in a Giant Kelp Forest

Reed, Daniel C., Foster, Michael S.·1984·Ecology

Abstract

The subtidal (10—15 m) assemblage in the relatively sheltered giant kelp forest at Stillwater Cove in Carmel Bay, California, consists of perennial species forming three major vertical layers: a Macrocystis pyrifera surface canopy, a dense subsurface canopy of another kelp, Pterygophora californica, and an understory of articulated and encrusting coralline algae. The kelp canopies alone or in combination can reduce bottom light to <30% (usually <1%) of surface influx. The effects of light reduction by these vegetation layers on algal recruitment and subsequent growth were determined by removing various combinations of canopies over a 2—yr period, and following subsequent changes relative to appropriate controls. Removing both M. pyrifera and P. californica canopies resulted in moderate recruitment of these species as well as of the annual brown alga Desmarestia ligulata var. ligulata. None of these algae recruited into control areas where one or both canopies were left intact. Highest brown and red algal recruitment occurred when both kelp canopies plus understory coralline branches were removed. Removal of the latter alone had no significant effect. The time of year when algal canopies were removed had little effect on the composition of subsequent algal colonization, as the recruitment of noncalcareous species occurred primarily during a short period in the spring. These results indicate that the relatively low levels of both physical and biological disturbance in Stillwater Cove allow the establishment of a few perennial algal species that inhibit their own recruitment, as well as invasion of other species, by shading. This contrasts with nearby kelp forests subjected to greater and more frequent disturbance, and characterized by a diverse assemblage of annual algal species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1938066

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 416

Metadata

Authors
Reed, D. C., & Foster, M. S.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-06
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
937-948
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2006500026
Cited by
416
References
17
FWCI
9.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Canopy Shadings on Algal Recruitment and Growth in a Giant Kelp Forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938066
The paper
Reed, D. C., & Foster, M. S. (1984). The Effects of Canopy Shadings on Algal Recruitment and Growth in a Giant Kelp Forest. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938066

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.