The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Belowground Carbon Allocation in Forest Ecosystems: Global Trends
Abstract
Carbon allocation to roots in forest ecosystems is estimated from published data on soil respiration and litterfall. On a global scale, rates of in situ soil respiration and aboveground litter production are highly and positively correlated, suggesting that above— and belowground production are controlled by the same factors. This relationship also allows us to predict rates of total soil respiration and total carbon allocation to roots in forest ecosystems from litterfall measurements. Over a gradient of litterfall carbon ranging from 70 to 500 g°m — 2 °yr — 1 , total belowground carbon allocation increases from 260 to 1100 g°m — 2 °yr — 1 . The ratio of belowground carbon allocation to litterfall decreases from 3.8 to 2.5 as litterfall carbon increases from 70 to 200 g°m — 2 °yr — 1 , but changes little (2.5 to 2.2) as litterfall carbon increases from 200 to 500 g°m — 2 °yr — 1 . Use of this relationship permits the construction of simple carbon budgets that can be used to place upper limits on estimates of fine root production in forest ecosystems. Determining live—root respiration rates in forest ecosystems will further constrain the range of possible root production rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems
Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., & Ellsworth, D. S. (1992) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937116 · Cited by 1,646
Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling
Hobbie, S. E. (1992) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(92)90126-v · Cited by 1,242
Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of eastern Amazonia
Davidson, E. A., Verchot, L. V., Cattânio, J. H., Ackerman, I. L., & Carvalho, J. E. M. (2000) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1006204113917 · Cited by 837
Interpreting, measuring, and modeling soil respiration
Ryan, M. G., & Law, B. E. (2005) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-004-5167-7 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Raich, J. W., & Nadelhoffer, K. J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-10
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1346-1354
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1996626298
- Cited by
- 796
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Belowground Carbon Allocation in Forest Ecosystems: Global Trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938194
- The paper
- Raich, J. W., & Nadelhoffer, K. J. (1989). Belowground Carbon Allocation in Forest Ecosystems: Global Trends. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.