Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 796

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Belowground Carbon Allocation in Forest Ecosystems: Global Trends

Raich, J. W., Nadelhoffer, K. J.·1989·Ecology

Abstract

Carbon allocation to roots in forest ecosystems is estimated from published data on soil respiration and litterfall. On a global scale, rates of in situ soil respiration and aboveground litter production are highly and positively correlated, suggesting that above— and belowground production are controlled by the same factors. This relationship also allows us to predict rates of total soil respiration and total carbon allocation to roots in forest ecosystems from litterfall measurements. Over a gradient of litterfall carbon ranging from 70 to 500 g°m — 2 °yr — 1 , total belowground carbon allocation increases from 260 to 1100 g°m — 2 °yr — 1 . The ratio of belowground carbon allocation to litterfall decreases from 3.8 to 2.5 as litterfall carbon increases from 70 to 200 g°m — 2 °yr — 1 , but changes little (2.5 to 2.2) as litterfall carbon increases from 200 to 500 g°m — 2 °yr — 1 . Use of this relationship permits the construction of simple carbon budgets that can be used to place upper limits on estimates of fine root production in forest ecosystems. Determining live—root respiration rates in forest ecosystems will further constrain the range of possible root production rates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1938194

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 796

Metadata

Authors
Raich, J. W., & Nadelhoffer, K. J.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-10
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
1346-1354
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W1996626298
Cited by
796
References
0
FWCI
29.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Belowground Carbon Allocation in Forest Ecosystems: Global Trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938194
The paper
Raich, J. W., & Nadelhoffer, K. J. (1989). Belowground Carbon Allocation in Forest Ecosystems: Global Trends. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938194

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.