The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patterns of Disturbance in Some Old‐Growth Mesic Forests of Eastern North America
Abstract
To characterize the disturbance regime of one type of vegetation, study areas in which relatively small—scale disturbance predominates were chosen in several old—growth mesic forests in the eastern United States. Canopy openings covered 9.5% of total land area. New gaps were formed at an average of 1% of total land area per year; old gap area closed at a similar rate primarily by sapling height growth. With increasing gap size, vegetation within gaps increased in woody species diversity, total basal area, and total number of stems. Stems also showed accelerated growth into larger size classes. As gaps aged, stems grew into larger size classes and basal area increased. Species responses to canopy gaps varied. Some species survived and became established in fairly small gaps (50—100 m 2). Although in large gaps (up to 2009 m 2 in the present study) these species usually increased in total number of stems and basal area, they declined in importance relative to species which rarely survived in small gaps but grew rapidly in large gaps. The disturbance regimes in the forests studied favored tolerant species but allowed opportunists to persist at low densities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Space-for-Time Substitution as an Alternative to Long-Term Studies
Pickett, S. T. A. (1989) · Long-Term Studies in Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-7358-6_5 · Cited by 1,451
From Balance of Nature to Hierarchical Patch Dynamics: A Paradigm Shift in Ecology
Wu, J., & Loucks, O. L. (1995) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/419172 · Cited by 1,246
A theory of the spatial and temporal dynamics of plant communities
Smith, T., & Huston, M. (1989) · Vegetatio · doi:10.1007/bf00031680 · Cited by 537
Liu, S., Bond-Lamberty, B., Hicke, J. A., Vargas, R., Zhao, S., Chen, J., Edburg, S. L., Hu, Y., Liu, J., McGuire, A. D., et al. (2011) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/2010jg001585 · Cited by 466
Gap dynamics of forest trees: A review with particular attention to boreal forests
McCarthy, J. (2001) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a00-012 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Runkle, J. R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-10
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1533-1546
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2114181376
- Cited by
- 955
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of Disturbance in Some Old‐Growth Mesic Forests of Eastern North America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938878
- The paper
- Runkle, J. R. (1982). Patterns of Disturbance in Some Old‐Growth Mesic Forests of Eastern North America. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938878
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.