Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Is Physical Space a Soil Resource?

McConnaughay, K. D. M., Bazzaz, F. A.·1991·Ecology

Abstract

We examined effects of differing levels of physical belowground space on the performance of several colonizing annual species in two experiments. Individual plants were grown in controlled greenhouse conditions under an experimental regime that independently varied nutrient addition rates and the physical space available for the deployment of roots while maintaining water supply at adequate rates. When equal amounts of nutrients were given, plants grown in greater volumes had greater vegetative growth and often higher reproductive output. Species differed in patterns or response to physical space in both vegetative and reproductive parameters. Abutilon theophrasti given larger soil volumes increased allocation to reproductive tissues relative to vegetative tissues. Setaria faberii, however, responded through a phenological shift: earlier flowering and greater reproductive output in smaller volumes. These results indicate that physical underground space, released in the formation of certain types of gaps, may influence the performance of colonizing annuals beyond providing access to other soil resources, such as nutrients and water.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1938905

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
McConnaughay, K. D. M., & Bazzaz, F. A.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-02
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
94-103
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W1974315899
Cited by
219
References
0
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Physical Space a Soil Resource? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938905
The paper
McConnaughay, K. D. M., & Bazzaz, F. A. (1991). Is Physical Space a Soil Resource? Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938905

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.