The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physiological Controls Over Seedling Growth in Primary Succession on an Alaskan Floodplain
Abstract
Competitive interactions were more important than facilitative processes in controlling seedling growth in primary succession on the Tanana River floodplain in interior Alaska. Low soil and plant nitrogen levels in early succession were ameliorated by stands of alder associated with nitrogen—fixing bacteria. Facilitation was demonstrated in the greehouse where alder (Alnus tenuifolia) soil enhanced growth of willow (Salix alaxensis) and poplar (Populus balsamifera) seedlings. Similarly, in the field, nutrient addition experiments and plant nutrient analyses demonstrated that all field—grown seedlings were least nutrient limited in alder stands. However, naturally occurring spruce (Picea glauca) seedlings and transplanted seedlings of alder and poplar grew least in alder stands where nitrogen levels were highest. Trenching and clear—cutting experiments demonstrated that alder stands inhibit seedling growth by root competition and shading. Physiological differences among the study species help explain their changing dominance through succession. Seedlings of species that establish in early succession (willow and poplar) grew more rapidly than alder. Late successional spruce seedlings had the slowest rates. In addition, spruce seedlings were more tolerant of the shaded conditions in alder stands than were early successional species. Consequently, only spruce seedlings continued to establish in later stages. We conclude that this floodplain succession is a result of a complex interaction of life history, facilitative, competitive, and stochastic processes. To understand succession in such sites, the relative importance of these interactive processes must be investigated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754
Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants
Boardman, N. K. (1977) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.002035 · Cited by 1,826
Cited by
Goldberg, D. E., & Barton, A. M. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285357 · Cited by 747
Woodland Expansions in the Platte River, Nebraska: Patterns and Causes
Johnson, W. C. (1994) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937055 · Cited by 549
Changes in plant interactions along a gradient of environmental stress
Pugnaire, F. I., & Luque, M. T. (2001) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930104.x · Cited by 494
The Effects of Herbivory and Granivory on Terrestrial Plant Succession
Davidson, D. W. (1993) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545305 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Walker, L. R., & Chapin, F. S.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1508-1523
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992938788
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological Controls Over Seedling Growth in Primary Succession on an Alaskan Floodplain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939082
- The paper
- Walker, L. R., & Chapin, F. S. (1986). Physiological Controls Over Seedling Growth in Primary Succession on an Alaskan Floodplain. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.