The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nest Predation in Forest Tracts and the Decline of Migratory Songbirds
Abstract
Nest predation has been suggested as an important cause of the decline of breeding populations of migratory songbirds in small woodlots in eastern North America. I tested this hypothesis by placing artificial nests with fresh quail eggs in forest of different sizes in Maryland and Tennessee. Predation rates were higher in small woodlots than in large tracts. Predation was especially intense in woodlots near suburban neighborhoods compared to woodlots in isolated rural areas. Experimental open—cups nests were move vulnerable to predators when placed on the ground vs. 1—2m above ground. In either position these open—cup nests were move vulnerable to predators than experimental cavity nests. Since most species of migratory songbirds construct open—cup nests, and several species place them near the ground, migratory songbirds should by strongly affected by higher predation rates in small forest tracts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review
SAUNDERS, D. A., HOBBS, R. J., & MARGULES, C. R. (1991) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x · Cited by 4,110
“For instance, in North America increased pressure from nest predators and parasites such as the Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater) has affected passerine bird populations in fragmented systems (Brittingham & Temple 1983; Wilcove 1985; Andren & Angelstam 1988).”
BackgroundMesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system
Crooks, K. R., & Soulé, M. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23028 · Cited by 1,721
Regional Forest Fragmentation and the Nesting Success of Migratory Birds
Robinson, S. K., Thompson, F. R., Donovan, T. M., Whitehead, D. R., & Faaborg, J. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.267.5206.1987 · Cited by 1,442
Use of Amazonian Forest Fragments by Understory Insectivorous Birds
Stouffer, P. C., & Bierregaard, R. O. (1995) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265818 · Cited by 609
Unravelling the structure of species extinction risk for predictive conservation science
Lee, T. M., & Jetz, W. (2011) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1877 · Cited by 248
Marzluff, J. M., & Neatherlin, E. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.026 · Cited by 231
Mankin, P. C., & Warner, R. E. (1997) · Conservation in Highly Fragmented Landscapes · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0656-7_7 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilcove, D. S.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-08
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1211-1214
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1998989163
- Cited by
- 1,029
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
