Cited by 231Avian ecology and behaviorWildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Corvid response to human settlements and campgrounds: Causes, consequences, and challenges for conservation

Marzluff, John M., Neatherlin, Erik·2006·Biological Conservation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.026

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marzluff, J. M., & Neatherlin, E.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Marzluff, John M.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
130
Issue
2
Pages
301-314
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065984778
Cited by
231
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
Corvidae, American crow, Corvus corax, Steller's jay, nest predation, marbled murrelet, human settlement, campsite, anthropogenic food, home range, annual survival, population density, predator assemblages, radio tagging, Olympic Peninsula, conservation management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review