The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interaction of Disturbances in Tallgrass Prairie: A Field Experiment
Abstract
A field study was conducted to address the roles of fire, cattle grazing, and the interaction of these two disturbances on plant species abundance and community structure in a tallgrass prairie. In 1985 and 1986, species composition was sampled in three replicates of the following grassland treatments: ungrazed + unburned (undisturbed), grazed + unburned, ungrazed + burned, and grazed + burned. Cover of the matrix—forming species Andropogon gerardii was significantly greater, while cover of the nonmatrix species Bromus tectorum was significantly lower, on the burned treatments than on the unburned treatments. The number and cover of annuals were significantly higher on the grazed treatments than on the ungrazed treatments. Species richness increased with increasing disturbance intensity. Diversity, however, was lowest on the ungrazed + burned treatment and highest on the grazed + burned treatment. Burning significantly reduced species diversity on ungrazed treatments, and grazing significantly increased diversity on the burned treatment. This study documented the dissimilar effects of different natural disturbances on grassland species, growth form characteristics, and community structure. In addition, the results emphasize the important role of interaction among disturbances on plant community structure in grasslands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390
Cited by
Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors
Naeem, S., Knops, J. M. H., Tilman, D., Howe, K. M., Kennedy, T., & Gale, S. (2000) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910108.x · Cited by 710
Pyric Herbivory: Rewilding Landscapes through the Recoupling of Fire and Grazing
FUHLENDORF, S. D., ENGLE, D. M., KERBY, J., & HAMILTON, R. (2009) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01139.x · Cited by 587
A rodent plague on prairie diversity
Howe, H. F., Brown, J. S., & Zorn‐Arnold, B. (2002) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00276.x · Cited by 108
Early effects of rodent granivory on experimental forb communities
Howe, H. F., & Brown, J. S. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0917:eeorgo]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 81
Koerner, S. E., & Collins, S. L. (2013) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9866-0 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Collins, S. L.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-10
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1243-1250
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2077609979
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interaction of Disturbances in Tallgrass Prairie: A Field Experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939208
- The paper
- Collins, S. L. (1987). Interaction of Disturbances in Tallgrass Prairie: A Field Experiment. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.