The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Litter Placement Effects on Microbial and Organic Matter Dynamics in an Agroecosystem
Abstract
Two different agricultural tillage practices were used to study how changes in the structure of the soil—litter system affected litter decomposition rates, microbial community composition, and soil organic matter dynamics. Surface straw placement results in spatial separation of carbon—rich litter (C:N ratio 80:1) and mineralized soil nitrogen. In contrast, when the litter is plowed into the soil, straw carbon and soil nitrogen are in intimate contact. Our field studies in Colorado showed that fungal biomass in surface—straw treatments was 144% of that in the incorporated—straw treatments, probably because fungi, with their extensive hyphal networks, are able to utilize both the surface straw carbon and the available soil nitrogen. Field studies using 14 C—labeled wheat straw showed that a greater proportion of added 14 C was retained in the surface—straw treatment than in the incorporated—straw treatment. Maximum net N immobilization was higher and litter decomposition was slower in the surface straw than in the incorporated straw placements both with and without experimental nitrogen addition. Slower litter decomposition of the surface litter may contribute to reduced soil organic matter losses. Soil organic matter losses may also be reduced in no—till systems as a result of the increase in the ratio of fungal to bacterial activity because of the greater growth efficiency of fungi and the accumulation of carbon in the less decomposable fungal biomass. The surface placement of straw in no—till agriculture allowed management of microclimate and microbial populations so that losses of soil organic matter and nutrients were minimized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems
Six, J., Frey, S. D., Thiet, R. K., & Batten, K. M. (2006) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.0347 · Cited by 2,176
Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic matter: mechanisms and controls
Sollins, P., Homann, P., & Caldwell, B. A. (1996) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(96)00036-5 · Cited by 1,578
Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure
Facelli, J. M., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1991) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02858763 · Cited by 1,543
Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses
Drinkwater, L. E., Wagoner, P., & Sarrantonio, M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/24376 · Cited by 1,186
Nitrogen Management Strategies to Reduce Nitrate Leaching in Tile‐Drained Midwestern Soils
Dinnes, D. L., Karlen, D. L., Jaynes, D. B., Kaspar, T. C., Hatfield, J. L., Colvin, T. S., & Cambardella, C. A. (2002) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2002.1530 · Cited by 1,010
Metadata
- Authors
- Holland, E. A., & Coleman, D. C.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-04
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 425-433
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2010247014
- Cited by
- 607
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Litter Placement Effects on Microbial and Organic Matter Dynamics in an Agroecosystem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939274
- The paper
- Holland, E. A., & Coleman, D. C. (1987). Litter Placement Effects on Microbial and Organic Matter Dynamics in an Agroecosystem. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939274
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.