Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 670

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Influences of Trees on Savanna Productivity: Tests of Shade, Nutrients, and Tree‐Grass Competition

Belsky, A. Joy·1994·Ecology

Abstract

To determine why herbaceous productivity in tropical and subtropical savannas is often significantly higher under crowns of isolated trees than in adjacent grass—lands, experimental plots were established in three concentric zones, crown, tree—root, and grassland, surrounding isolated trees of Acacia tortilis in low—rainfall and high—rainfall savannas in Tsavo National Park, Kenya. Plots were fertilized (to determine the importance of nutrient enrichment by trees), shaded (to determine the importance of crown shade), fertilized and shaded (to identify fertilizer x shade interactions), or trenched (tree roots entering plots were severed to determine the importance of belowground competition between overstory trees and understory herbaceous plants). In addition, vertical root distributions of trees and herbaceous species were determined, and root systems of A. tortilis saplings were excavated. At both sites fertilization significantly increased herbaceous productivity in tree—root and grassland zones, but not in canopy zones; artificial shade had no effect on productivity at the low—rainfall site but increased productivity in the tree—root zone at the high—rainfall site; and severing tree roots had no effect on herbaceous productivity at the low—rainfall site, but increased productivity in the crown and tree—root zones at the high—rainfall site. Roots of herbaceous and woody species co—occurred within the same soil horizons, but tree roots extended farther into grasslands at the low—rainfall site than at the high—rainfall site. These studies suggest that savanna trees completed more intensely with understory plants at wetters sites, where their roots terminated in or near crown zones, than at drier sites, where their roots extended farther into open grassland. Nutrients added by trees to crown zones in the form of tree litter and animal droppings increased understory productivity by fertilizing nutrient—limited soils. Shade contributed more to regrowth after severe defoliation than to growth under more normal conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1939416

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 670

Metadata

Authors
Belsky, A. J.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-06
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
922-932
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2169997839
Cited by
670
References
0
FWCI
14.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influences of Trees on Savanna Productivity: Tests of Shade, Nutrients, and Tree‐Grass Competition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939416
The paper
Belsky, A. J. (1994). Influences of Trees on Savanna Productivity: Tests of Shade, Nutrients, and Tree‐Grass Competition. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939416

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.