Cited by 523Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesPlant Ecology and Soil ScienceEcosystem dynamics and resilience

Deciphering the distribution of the savanna biome

Lehmann, Caroline E. R., Archibald, Sally A., Hoffmann, William A., Bond, William J.·2011·New Phytologist

Abstract

• We aimed to identify the limits of savanna across Africa, Australia and South America. We based our investigation on the rich history of hypotheses previously examined: that the limits of savanna are variously determined by rainfall, rainfall seasonality, soil fertility and disturbance. • We categorized vegetation on all continents as 'savanna' (open habitats with a C(4) grass layer) or 'not-savanna' (closed habitats with no C(4) grass layer) and used a combination of statistical approaches to examine how the presence of savanna varied as a function of five environmental correlates. • The presence of savanna is constrained by effective rainfall and rainfall seasonality. Soil fertility is regionally important, although the direction of its effect changes relative to rainfall. We identified three continental divergences in the limits of savanna that could not be explained by environment. • Climate and soils do not have a deterministic effect on the distribution of savanna. Over the range of savanna, some proportion of the land is always 'not-savanna'. We reconciled previous contradictory views of savanna limits by developing a new conceptual framework for understanding these limits by categorizing environmental factors into whether they had a positive or negative effect on woody growth and the frequency of disturbance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03689.x

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The probability of fire and the occurrence of the savanna biome coincide clearly across Africa, Australia, and South America.

    “In contrast, the probability of fire and the occurrence of the savanna biome coincide clearly across Africa, Australia, and South America (24).”

    From Defining pyromes and global syndromes of fire regimes (2013) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehmann, C. E. R., Archibald, S. A., Hoffmann, W. A., & Bond, W. J.
Affiliations
  • Charles Darwin University (AU)
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ZA)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Lehmann, Caroline E. R.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-04
Volume
191
Issue
1
Pages
197-209
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2127934604
Cited by
523
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 19
FWCI
21.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New Phytologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Plant Ecology and Soil Science
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Keywords
savanna biome, C4 grasses, rainfall, precipitation seasonality, soil fertility, disturbance, vegetation classification, environmental drivers of vegetation, Africa, Australia, South America
MeSH terms
Africa, Australia, Fires, Models, Theoretical, Plants, Population Dynamics, Rain, Seasons, South America, Ecosystem, Plant Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review