The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nontraditional Regression Analyses
Abstract
Least—squares linear regression and multiple regression are among the most commonly used analytical techniques of ecologists. However, these techniques only address a portion of the possible applications of regression methods. We discuss two less commonly used regression analyses that could find wide application in ecology, logistic regression and LOWESS regression. Logistic regression is appropriate in cases where the dependent variable is categorical, dichotomous, or polychotomus. It can be used with continuous and/or discrete independent variables. Logistic regression is motivated by the underlying binomial or multinomial distribution of dichotomous and polychotomous dependent variables and transforms the data to explicitly model these distributions. Locally weighted regression scatterplot smoothing or LOWESS regression is used to model the relationship between a dependent variable and independent variable when no single functional form will do. LOWESS regression is motivated by the assumption that neighboring values of the independent variable are the best indicators of the dependent variable in that range of independent values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Agresti, A. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471249688 · Cited by 6,746
A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation
Efron, B., & Gong, G. (1983) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1983.10483087 · Cited by 3,229
Statistical data analysis in the computer age
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.253.5018.390 · Cited by 1,192
Cited by
Alterations of Riparian Ecosystems Caused by River Regulation
NILSSON, C., & BERGGREN, K. (2000) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0783:aorecb]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 991
MASS/LENGTH RESIDUALS: MEASURES OF BODY CONDITION OR GENERATORS OF SPURIOUS RESULTS?
Green, A. J. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1473:mlrmob]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 895
Ayers, J. W., Ribisl, K. M., & Brownstein, J. S. (2011) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.007 · Cited by 300
Kunkel, K. E., & Pletscher, D. H. (2000) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z99-181 · Cited by 164
Protected‐Area Boundaries as Filters of Plant Invasions
FOXCROFT, L. C., JAROŠÍK, V., PYŠEK, P., RICHARDSON, D. M., & ROUGET, M. (2011) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01617.x · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Trexler, J. C., & Travis, J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1629-1637
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2077573539
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nontraditional Regression Analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939921
- The paper
- Trexler, J. C., & Travis, J. (1993). Nontraditional Regression Analyses. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939921
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.