The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Individualistic Growth Response of Tundra Plant Species to Environmental Manipulations in the Field
Abstract
In undisturbed arctic tussock and wet meadow tundras we increased air temperature with a plastic greenhouse, increased nutrient availability by NPK fertilization, and decreased light intensity with shade cloth to determine the factors limiting growth of tundra plants. After 2 yr of these manipulations we measured growth of each major vascular species and one moss species. Each species showed a different pattern of growth response to alteration of light, air temperature, and nutrient regimes, indicating that no single factor limits growth of all species in these communities. Growth of canopy species (Betula nana, Ledum palustre, Carex bigelowii, and Eriophorum vaginatum) was reduced by experimental shading more than was growth of understory species (e.g., Vaccinium vitisidaea and Rubus chamaemorus). Species typical of nutrient—rich sites (Betula nana, Rubus chamaemorus, and Polygonum bistorta) generally responded more to nutrient addition than did species typical of nutrient—poor sites (e.g., Empetrum nigrum), although there were species characteristic of fertile sites (Salix pulchra) and infertile sites (Ledum palustre) which did not show this pattern of nutrient response. Species that grow in warm hollows between tussocks showed less growth in response to increased air temperature than did canopy species. We suggest that lack of a single common factor limiting growth of all species in tussock and wet meadow tundras implies that (1) each species is individualistically distributed, as described by the continuum model of community organization, (2) as a result of competition and/or distinct evolutionary histories, the growth of each species is limited by a different combination of environmental factors, and (3) production by individual species varies greatly from year to year, but production by the whole vegetation is more stable, because years that are favorable for growth of some species cause a compensatory decrease in growth of other species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/04-0922 · Cited by 8,046
Self-citationConsequences of changing biodiversity
Chapin III, F. S., Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D. U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O. E., Hobbie, S. E., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012241 · Cited by 4,282
Invasive Plants Versus Their New and Old Neighbors: A Mechanism for Exotic Invasion
Callaway, R. M., & Aschehoug, E. T. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5491.521 · Cited by 1,454
Opposing plant community responses to warming with and without herbivores
Post, E., & Pedersen, C. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0802421105 · Cited by 491
Holocene Isochrone Maps and Patterns of Tree-Spreading in the British Isles
Birks, H. J. B. (1989) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.2307/2845208 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapin, F. S., & Shaver, G. R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-04
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 564-576
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2045024292
- Cited by
- 665
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individualistic Growth Response of Tundra Plant Species to Environmental Manipulations in the Field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940405
- The paper
- Chapin, F. S., & Shaver, G. R. (1985). Individualistic Growth Response of Tundra Plant Species to Environmental Manipulations in the Field. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.